specifications Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Sedan 2002 - 2005 Sedan
Technical characteristics of Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Sedan 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005: Power, fuel consumption per 100 km, weight (mass), road clearance (clearance), reversal radius, type of transmission and brakes, body sizes and tires
Engine characteristics
| Modifications | Engine, cm3 | Power, kW (hp) / about | Cylinders | Torque, nm / (rpm) | Type of fuel system | Type of fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,0 CD (120 hp) | 1998 | 88(120)/3500 | L4 (inline location) | 310/2000 | COMMON RAIL. | Diesel |
| 2,0 CD (136 hp) | 1998 | 100(136)/3500 | L4 (inline location) | 310/2000 | COMMON RAIL. | Diesel |
| 1.8 16V. | 1798 | 88(120)/5500 | L4 (inline location) | 165/4300 | Multipoint injection | Petrol |
| 2.0 16V. | 1999 | 104(141)/6000 | L4 (inline location) | 181/4100 | Multipoint injection | Petrol |
| 2.3 16V. | 2261 | 122(166)/6500 | L4 (inline location) | 207/4000 | Multipoint injection | Petrol |
| 3.0 V6. | 2967 | 162(220)/6300-6500 | V6. | 260/4750-5000 | Multipoint injection | Petrol |
Drive and Transmission
| Modifications | type of drive | Transmission type (basic) | Transmission type (optional) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,0 CD (120 hp) | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCPP | |
| 2,0 CD (136 hp) | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCPP | |
| 1.8 16V. | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCPP | |
| 2.0 16V. | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCPP | 4-automatic |
| 2.3 16V. | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCPP | |
| 3.0 V6. | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCPP | 4-automatic |
Brake system and power steering
| Modifications | Type of front brakes | Type of rear brakes | Power steering |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,0 CD (120 hp) | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 2,0 CD (136 hp) | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 1.8 16V. | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 2.0 16V. | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 2.3 16V. | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 3.0 V6. | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
Tire size
| Modifications | The size |
|---|---|
| 2,0 CD (120 hp) | 205/55 R16V. |
| 2,0 CD (136 hp) | 205/55 R16V. |
| 1.8 16V. | 205/55 VR16 |
| 2.0 16V. | 205/55 R16V. |
| 2.3 16V. | 215/45 R17W |
| 3.0 V6. | 205/55 R16V. |
Sizes
| Modifications | Length, mm. | Width, mm. | Height, mm. | Front track / rear, mm | Wheel base, mm | Road clearance (clearance), mm | The volume of the trunk, l |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,0 CD (120 hp) | 4681 | 1781 | 1435 | 1539/1539 | 2675 | 150 | 501 |
| 2,0 CD (136 hp) | 4681 | 1781 | 1435 | 1539/1539 | 2675 | 150 | 501 |
| 1.8 16V. | 4681 | 1781 | 1435 | 1539/1539 | 2675 | 150 | 501 |
| 2.0 16V. | 4681 | 1781 | 1435 | 1539/1539 | 2675 | 150 | 501 |
| 2.3 16V. | 4681 | 1781 | 1435 | 1539/1539 | 2675 | 150 | 501 |
| 3.0 V6. | 4681 | 1781 | 1435 | 1539/1539 | 2675 | 150 | 501 |
Car weight
| Modifications | Curb weight, kg | Maximum mass, kg | Load capacity, kg. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,0 CD (120 hp) | 1385 | 1930 | 545 |
| 2,0 CD (136 hp) | 1385 | 1930 | 545 |
| 1.8 16V. | 1245 | 1815 | 570 |
| 2.0 16V. | 1250 | 1840 | 590 |
| 2.3 16V. | 1315 | 1885 | 570 |
| 3.0 V6. | 1470 | 1970 | 500 |
Dynamics
| Modifications | Maximum speed, km / h | Overclocking time up to 100 km / h, with | CD (frontal resistance coefficient) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,0 CD (120 hp) | 198 | 10.8 | - |
| 2,0 CD (136 hp) | 198 | 10.4 | - |
| 1.8 16V. | 196 | 10.7 | - |
| 2.0 16V. | 208 | 9.7 | - |
| 2.3 16V. | 214 | 8.9 | - |
| 3.0 V6. | 230 | 8 | - |
Fuel consumption
| Modifications | In the city, l / 100 km | On the highway, l / 100 km | Average consumption, l / 100 km | CO2 release, g / km | Type of fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,0 CD (120 hp) | 8.3 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 179 | Diesel |
| 2,0 CD (136 hp) | 8.3 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 179 | Diesel |
| 1.8 16V. | 11 | 5.9 | 7.7 | 198 | Petrol |
| 2.0 16V. | 11.2 | 6.2 | 8 | 203 | Petrol |
| 2.3 16V. | 12.2 | 7 | 8.9 | 212 | Petrol |
Prices Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Sedan 2002 - 2005 in Russia (Updated April 22, 2016)
| Modifications in G.V. | Total cars for sale (in the Russian Federation) | Average price, rubles |
The average price of S. Automatic transmission, rubles |
Total for sale with automatic transmission | The average price of S. MCPP, rubles |
Total for sale with MCPP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 35 | 412 029 | 417 854 | 31 | 367 513 | 7 |
| 2003 | 57 | 424 072 | 427 513 | 46 | 409 992 | 16 |
| 2004 | 72 | 439 399 | 449 115 | 46 | 422 765 | 30 |
| 2005 | 95 | 481 124 | 499 262 | 46 | 464 460 | 49 |
Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) sedan 2002 - 2005 from specialists
Reviews Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Sedan detailed| Mazda 6 (Atenza) Sedan 2002 - 2005 | |
|---|---|
| Engine |  |
| Transmission |  |
| Management and suspension system | |
| Brake system | |
| Heated air and air conditioning | |
| Start and Charging System | |
| Electrical components and other | |
| Body stability to corrosion | |
Video crash tests Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Sedan 2002 - 2005
Video Test Drives Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Sedan 2002 - 2005
Hardware Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Sedan 2002 - 2005
Crash Test Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Sedan 2002 - 2005
26%
Driver and passengers
7%
Pedestrians
34%
Children-passengers
Test drive
Do not be bored!
A spacious family car may well be expressive and sensual as a sports coupe. An example of this - Mazda 6. Many Japanese brands recently reproached in lightness. However, it's time to forget about it. Cars from the country of the rising sun are diverse in design and very advanced in design. The latter strikes his traditional condudes image ...
Recipes universality
Volkswagen Passatnaya model of the wagon debuted in 1997, and in 2000 it was updated. For the body of the body Sedan and Universal. In the Russian market, the front-wheel drive option is supplied with four gasoline 2.0; 1.8T; V5 2.3; V6 2.8 (115 190 l.) And two diesel 1,9tdi (130 l. P.), V6TDI (2.5 l, 163 ...
Soul mates
In our market, powerful versions of these two family sedans look straight competitors. Like a cat with a dog from us in childhood I did not want to have a brother? Well, or at the thin end sister? As I remember, I was very worried when my parents promised to think about it in the next five-year plan. However, maybe they were right. After all…