technical characteristics of Land Rover Freelander 2003 - 2007 SUV
Technical characteristics of Land Rover Freelander 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007: power, fuel consumption per 100 km, weight (mass), road clearance (clearance), radius of reversal, type of transmission and brakes, body size and tires
Engine characteristics
| Modifications | Engine volume, cm3 | Power, kW (lp)/about | Cylinders | Twisting, Nm/(rpm) | Type of the fuel system | Type of fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TD4 | 1951 | 82(112)/4000 | L4 (in -line location) | 260/1750 | Common Rail | Diesel |
| 1.8i | 1796 | 86(117)/5550 | L4 (in -line location) | 160/2750 | Multiple injection | Petrol |
| 2.5i V6 | 2497 | 130(177)/6250 | V6 | 240/4000 | Multiple injection | Petrol |
Drive and transmission
| Modifications | type of drive | Type of transmission (basic) | Type of transmission (optionally) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TD4 | 4x4 (all -wheel drive) | 5-MKPP | |
| 1.8i | 4x4 (all -wheel drive) | 5-MKPP | |
| 2.5i V6 | 4x4 (all -wheel drive) | 5-ACPP |
Brake system and steering wheel amplifier
| Modifications | Type of front brakes | Type of rear brakes | Power steering |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TD4 | Ventilated discs | Drum | no |
| 1.8i | Ventilated discs | Drum | no |
| 2.5i V6 | Ventilated discs | Drum | no |
The size of the tires
| Modifications | The size |
|---|---|
| 2.0 TD4 | 195/80R15 |
| 1.8i | 195/80R15 |
| 2.5i V6 | 195/80R15 |
Dimensions
| Modifications | Length, mm | Width, mm | Height, mm | The track front/back, mm | Wheel base, mm | Road clearance (clearance), mm | Trunk volume, l |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TD4 | 4420 | 1811 | 1709 | 1529/1539 | 2560 | 211 | 354 |
| 1.8i | 4420 | 1811 | 1709 | 1529/1539 | 2560 | 211 | 354 |
| 2.5i V6 | 4420 | 1811 | 1709 | 1529/1539 | 2560 | 211 | 354 |
Car weight
| Modifications | Equipped mass, kg | Maximum mass, kg | Lifting capacity, kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TD4 | 1593 | 2080 | 487 |
| 1.8i | 1420 | 2040 | 620 |
| 2.5i V6 | 1540 | 2060 | 520 |
Dynamics
| Modifications | Maximum speed, km/h | Acceleration time to 100 km/h, with | CD (frontal resistance coefficient) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TD4 | 164 | 14.4 | 0.39 |
| 1.8i | 170 | 12.6 | 0.39 |
| 2.5i V6 | 182 | 11.1 | 0.39 |
Fuel consumption
| Modifications | In the city, l/100 km | On the highway, l/100 km | Average consumption, l/100 km | Extrication CO2, g/km | Type of fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TD4 | 9.1 | 6.7 | 7.6 | 205 | Diesel |
| 1.8i | 13.6 | 8.5 | 10.4 | 248 | Petrol |
| 2.5i V6 | 17.2 | 9.7 | 12.4 | 298 | Petrol |
Prices Land Rover Freelander 2003 - 2007 in Russia (updated April 22, 2016)
| Modifications in G.V. | Total cars on sale (in the Russian Federation) | Average price, rubles |
Average price s Automatic transmission, rubles |
Total on sale with automatic transmission | Average price s Manual transmission, rubles |
Total on sale with manual transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 46 | 583 558 | 587 232 | 31 | 566 590 | 9 |
| 2005 | 46 | 634 575 | 632 114 | 30 | 639 170 | 20 |
| 2006 | 22 | 672 985 | 694 013 | 10 | 651 184 | 10 |
| 2007 | 92 | 993 013 | 1 012 418 | 72 | 933 268 | 25 |
Video Crash tests Land Rover Freelander 2003 - 2007
Configurations Land Rover Freelander 2003 - 2007
Test drives
Certificate of maturity
Why change your face? Get rid of creditors, hide from enemies, find a second youth ... After plastic surgery, you can celebrate the next birthday - it was a good reason for a new meeting with Land Rover Freelander. Russian journalists who participated in the tested Land Rover Freelander test have the impression that restyling work was ordered ...
Traces on the floor
Evil tongues called them SUVs. This did not prevent compact SUVs from winning the hearts and wallets of customers. Today, such cars are produced by many. And the results of the auto -films achieve different ones. Land Rover Freelander and BMW X3 - to a certain extent relatives: the smallest English SUV was designed during the German leadership. Nevertheless, these two ...
All -Iszonniki
Many do not like the term PARTICES, although there is a proportion of common sense in it. Indeed, in comparison with full -fledged SUV, the SUVs are resting. Is it more fair to start with such assessments from the possibilities of a car? Here the advantages of compact universals Off-Road are obvious. Indeed, in 90% of cases for the congress from asphalt it is enough to have an increased clearance and ...