specifications Ford Mondeo Sedan 2005 - 2007 Sedan
Specifications Ford Mondeo Sedan 2005, 2006, 2007: Power, fuel consumption 100 km, weight (weight), road clearance (clearance), reversal radius, type of transmission and brakes, body sizes and tires
Engine characteristics
| Modifications | Engine volume, cm3 | Power, kW (hp) / about | Cylinders | Torque, nm / (rpm) | Type of fuel system | Type of fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCI (115 hp) | 1998 | 85(115)/3950 | L4 (inline location) | 280/1900 | COMMON RAIL. | Diesel |
| 2.0 TDCI (130 hp) | 1998 | 96(130)/3800 | L4 (inline location) | 330/1800 | COMMON RAIL. | Diesel |
| 2.0 TDDI | 1998 | 66(90)/4000 | L4 (inline location) | 245/1900 | Direct injection | Diesel |
| 2.2 TDCI | 2198 | 114(155)/3500 | L4 (inline location) | 360/1800 | COMMON RAIL. | Diesel |
| 1.8 (110 hp) | 1798 | 81(110)/5500 | L4 (inline location) | 165/3950 | Multipoint injection | Petrol |
| 1.8 (125 hp) | 1798 | 92(125)/6000 | L4 (inline location) | 170/4500 | Multipoint injection | Petrol |
| 2 | 1999 | 107(145)/6000 | L4 (inline location) | 190/4500 | Multipoint injection | Petrol |
| 2.5 | 2498 | 125(170)/6000 | V6. | 220/4250 | Multipoint injection | Petrol |
| 3 | 2967 | 150(204)/6000 | V6. | 280/4900 | Multipoint injection | Petrol |
Drive and Transmission
| Modifications | type of drive | Transmission type (basic) | Transmission type (optional) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCI (115 hp) | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCP | 5-automatic transmission, 6-MCPP, |
| 2.0 TDCI (130 hp) | Front-wheel drive | 6-MCP | 5-automatic |
| 2.0 TDDI | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCP | |
| 2.2 TDCI | Front-wheel drive | 6-MCP | |
| 1.8 (110 hp) | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCP | |
| 1.8 (125 hp) | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCP | |
| 2 | Front-wheel drive | 5-MCP | 4-automatic |
| 2.5 | Front-wheel drive | 6-MCP | 5-automatic |
| 3 | Front-wheel drive | 6-MCP |
Brake system and power steering
| Modifications | Type of front brakes | Type of rear brakes | Power steering |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCI (115 hp) | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 2.0 TDCI (130 hp) | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 2.0 TDDI | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 2.2 TDCI | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 1.8 (110 hp) | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 1.8 (125 hp) | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 2 | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 2.5 | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
| 3 | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
Tire size
| Modifications | The size |
|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCI (115 hp) | 205/55R16. |
| 2.0 TDCI (130 hp) | 205/55R16. |
| 2.0 TDDI | 205/55R16. |
| 2.2 TDCI | 205/50R17 |
| 1.8 (110 hp) | 205/55R16. |
| 1.8 (125 hp) | 205/55R16. |
| 2 | 205/55R16. |
| 2.5 | 205/50R17 |
| 3 | 225/40 R18. |
Dimensions
| Modifications | Length, mm. | Width, mm. | Height, mm. | Front track / rear, mm | Wheel base, mm | Road clearance (clearance), mm | The volume of the trunk, l |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCI (115 hp) | 4729 | 1811 | 1430 | 1519/1539 | 2751 | - | 498 |
| 2.0 TDCI (130 hp) | 4729 | 1811 | 1430 | 1519/1539 | 2751 | - | 498 |
| 2.0 TDDI | 4729 | 1811 | 1430 | 1519/1539 | 2751 | - | 498 |
| 2.2 TDCI | 4729 | 1811 | 1430 | 1519/1539 | 2751 | - | 498 |
| 1.8 (110 hp) | 4729 | 1811 | 1430 | 1519/1539 | 2751 | - | 498 |
| 1.8 (125 hp) | 4729 | 1811 | 1430 | 1519/1539 | 2751 | - | 498 |
| 2 | 4729 | 1811 | 1430 | 1519/1539 | 2751 | - | 498 |
| 2.5 | 4729 | 1811 | 1430 | 1519/1539 | 2751 | - | 498 |
| 3 | 4729 | 1811 | 1430 | 1519/1539 | 2751 | - | 498 |
Car weight
| Modifications | Curb weight, kg | Maximum mass, kg | Load capacity, kg. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCI (115 hp) | 1416 | 1975 | 559 |
| 2.0 TDCI (130 hp) | 1417 | 2000 | 583 |
| 2.0 TDDI | 1410 | 1975 | 565 |
| 2.2 TDCI | 1467 | 2005 | 538 |
| 1.8 (110 hp) | 1299 | 1865 | 566 |
| 1.8 (125 hp) | 1302 | 1865 | 563 |
| 2 | 1305 | 1865 | 560 |
| 2.5 | 1399 | 1940 | 541 |
| 3 | 1403 | 1985 | 582 |
Dynamics
| Modifications | Maximum speed, km / h | Overclocking time up to 100 km / h, with | CD (frontal resistance coefficient) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCI (115 hp) | 197 | 10.8 | 0.3 |
| 2.0 TDCI (130 hp) | 200 | 9.9 | 0.3 |
| 2.0 TDDI | 180 | 12.8 | 0.3 |
| 2.2 TDCI | 220 | 8.7 | 0.3 |
| 1.8 (110 hp) | 193 | 11.6 | 0.3 |
| 1.8 (125 hp) | 205 | 10.8 | 0.3 |
| 2 | 215 | 9.8 | 0.3 |
| 2.5 | 225 | 8.7 | 0.3 |
| 3 | 240 | 7.9 | 0.3 |
Fuel consumption
| Modifications | In the city, l / 100 km | On the highway, l / 100 km | Average consumption, l / 100 km | CO2 release, g / km | Type of fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TDCI (115 hp) | 7.9 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 152 | Diesel |
| 2.0 TDCI (130 hp) | 8 | 4.6 | 5.8 | 154 | Diesel |
| 2.0 TDDI | 8.2 | 4.6 | 5.9 | 156 | Diesel |
| 2.2 TDCI | 8.2 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 161 | Diesel |
| 1.8 (110 hp) | 11 | 5.6 | 7.6 | 182 | Petrol |
| 1.8 (125 hp) | 11.2 | 5.8 | 7.8 | 187 | Petrol |
| 2 | 11.5 | 6 | 8 | 192 | Petrol |
| 2.5 | 14.3 | 7.3 | 9.9 | 238 | Petrol |
| 3 | 15.1 | 7.5 | 10.3 | 247 | Petrol |
Prices Ford Mondeo Sedan 2005 - 2007 in Russia (Updated April 22, 2016)
| Modifications in G.V. | Total cars for sale (in the Russian Federation) | Average price, rubles |
The average price of S. Automatic transmission, rubles |
Total for sale with automatic transmission | The average price of S. MCPP, rubles |
Total for sale with manual transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 99 | 466 120 | 474 303 | 30 | 463 198 | 80 |
| 2007 | 82 | 559 156 | 553 140 | 22 | 561 179 | 65 |
Video crash tests Ford Mondeo Sedan 2005 - 2007
Installation Ford Mondeo Sedan 2005 - 2007
Test drive
D-Power
Four of the prestigious and powerful-sized sedan is the most adequate format for our conditions. And the business meeting is not ashamed to come, and the family will fit without problems. Again, comfort ... On a large field of the proposed models, we chose four machines with a volume of more than two liters and in the configuration above average. That is what Hyundai ...
feel the difference
One of them is one and a half times more powerful than the other, but three times more. And the one that costs less, and much more comfortable. But the expensive turns are turning faster. Do you feel the difference? Machines not just different sometimes appears the feeling that they represent the different branches of the automotive evolution. So we tried to understand what differences the difference expresses ...
Compare: Ford Mondeo VS. Opel Vectra.
Today's heroes are among the middle class cars in the alphabet classification class D. We can say that it is from them that this segment begins, they are most affordable in it, and the prices for them in low-cost equipment are quite comparable even with representatives of the golf class. Both models have already survived updates, and the restyling vectra appeared ...