Krash test Subaru Impreza 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Labotor assessment of the safety of the car: the ranking in points, the test report (photo and video crash test)
Side collision with car (points), and with post (7.1 points)
Automobile
Pillar
Head Airbag
There is
Breast Airbag
There is
Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)
Description of the chair
Type of head restraint
Passive
Geometric assessment
0.1
Test
- Strong kick
2.4
- Middle Stick
2
- Weak strike
2.3
Children's passengers. Total score 36 | 73%
Child up to 18 months
Brand chair
BRITAX ROMER BABY SAFE PLUS
Front shock
Emergency Group
0, 0+
Head move forward
Protected
Location
Face back
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Fastening
Isofix.
Chest load
Significant
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
8.7
Fixation of the head
Protected
Marking Evaluation
4
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Evaluation of fastening
2
Child older than 3 years
Brand chair
Britax Romer Duo Plus
Front shock
Emergency Group
1
Head move forward
Protected
Location
Face forward
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Fastening
Isofix.
Chest load
Insignificant
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
12
Fixation of the head
Protected
Marking Evaluation
4
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Evaluation of fastening
2
Assessment of car
3
Airbag Prevention Warning
Warning sticker on sunscreen visor
Pedestrians. Total score 26 | 72% System Act. Safety Common Score 5 | 57%
- Fine
- Good
- Satisfactory
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter
0 (missing)
Stability Course (ESC)
3 (optional)
Signaling about unatigned safety belts
1 (driver)
Head
16.2
Hip area
3.6
Legs
6
Protection of adult passengers:
With a frontal blow, the passenger salon was deformed slightly, and the windshield rack shifted back only 3 mm. The knees and hips of both front sedimons were protected well. The manufacturer managed to prove that the same level of protection is provided by passengers of any complexion and in any position. With lateral impact on the post, the high load on the rib speaks about the weak breast protection. The survey of the car after a side strike of the overlap showed that the back door from the side of the strike almost opened and kept only in the second position of the castle, for which the penalty points were accrued. Protection against injuries at the blow from behind is recognized as weak.
Security of passenger children
Based on the testimony of mannequin sensors, the protection of a 3-year passenger during front and side blows earned the highest marks. The front airbag of the passenger cannot be turned off, so the installation of a children's chair "against the direction of movement" is unacceptable for this place. A warning about this is not performed in the languages \u200b\u200bof all countries in which the car is sold, so the scores were accrued for the text warning. Properly notice the availability of the installation of the chair using the ISOFIX mounting system on the rear seats.
Protection of pedestrians
Bumper scored the maximum number of points for protecting foot pedestrians. The surface of the hood provided good softening of the strike in most places where the child's head falls.
Protection of pedestrians
In accordance with the new requirements of EURO NCAP, the stabilization system has become more widespread. From mid-February 2009, Vehicle Dynamics Control system is included in the basic configuration for most Impreza versions, and the option for the rest sold in the European market. Also, the car is equipped with an alarm of an unused driver's seat belt.