Crash Test Hyundai Getz 5 doors 2002 - 2005 hatchback

Crash test Hyundai Getz 5 doors 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005: Labotor safety safety assessment: Rating in points, test report (photo and video crash test)
25%
Driver and passengers
5%
Pedestrians
37%
Children-passengers

Protection of the driver and passenger

driver Damage at Lobby
Frosting, driver
passenger Damage at Lobby
Front punch, passenger
driver damage with lateral impact
Side blow, driver
Fine - Fine
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months Britax Roemer Baby-Safe Plus, Life Back
Child older than 3 years Britax Roemer Duo Plus, face forward

Pedestrian safety

the result of the crash test is excellent - Fine
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is satisfactory - Satisfactorily

Comments:

Getz turned out to be a very balanced car and earned his four stars. Security systems included single-stage windy airbags, side cushions and security curtains, pretensioners and front belt load limiters. The driver also proposed an alarm on an unused seat belt. The protection of children, in general, turned out to be good, but pedestrians of such preferences are not provided.

Front punch:

The body design was recognized as reliable. However, the rear of the leg niches is very deformed. Loads recorded by sensors in mannequins were quite large. The driver's left foot was also highlighted. Due to the contact of the drivers and the front passenger's knees with rigid elements around the steering column and under the surface of the front panel, legs are exposed to a significant risk of injury.

Security of passenger children:

The danger of placing the children's chair "against the direction of movement" at the place of the front passenger with an active security pillow reported a durable sticker on the passenger sunscreen visor, visible in the folded state. The protection of juvenile passengers was at a high level. The eldest child was located in the Britax Romer Duo Plus chair, fixed by the "face forward" in ISOFIX castles and upper mounts. 18-month was planted in the Britax Romer Babysafe chair, fixed "against the direction of movement" using a seat belt. With the frontal ular, the load on the neck of the younger child was high.

Side strike:

An impressive lateral protection system included two-chamber side pillows in the backs of chairs. The load on the chest driver turned out to be slightly high, but the penalty points were accrued also for uncharacteristic for real conditions, the load distribution between the back of the mannequin and the chair, which reduced sensor readings.

Pedestrian safety:

At least some kind of protection provided the points where the head of the pedestrian head arrives at the height. All other places were dangerous. Bad result.

General information about the car

Roelf location Left
Tested model Hyundai Getz 1.3.
Body type 5-door hatchback
Year of publishing data 2004
Curb weight 1072
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... KMHBT51HP5U319180.

Installation Systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is
Front Belts Load Loaders There is
Driver Front Airbag There is
Passenger Front Airbag There is
Side airbags There is
Side Head Airbags There is
Driver's knees and feet airbag No

Photo crash test