technical characteristics Volvo S40 2004 - 2007 Sedan
Technical characteristics of Volvo S40 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007: power, fuel consumption per 100 km, weight (mass), road clearance (clearance), radius of turning, type of transmission and brakes, body size and tires
Engine characteristics
Modifications | Engine volume, cm3 | Power, kW (lp)/about | Cylinders | Twisting, Nm/(rpm) | Type of the fuel system | Type of fuel |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 d | 1560 | 81(110)/4000 | L4 (in -line location) | 240/1750 | Common Rail | Diesel |
2.0 d | 1998 | 100(136)/4000 | L4 (in -line location) | 320/2000 | Common Rail | Diesel |
D5 | 2401 | 132(180)/4000 | In -line location: L5 | 350/1750 | Common Rail | Diesel |
1.6 | 1596 | 74(100)/6000 | L4 (in -line location) | 150/4000 | Multiple injection | Petrol |
1.8 | 1798 | 92(125)/6000 | L4 (in -line location) | 165/4000 | Multiple injection | Petrol |
2 | 1999 | 107(145)/6000 | L4 (in -line location) | 185/4500 | Multiple injection | Petrol |
2.4 | 2435 | 103(140)/5000 | In -line location: L5 | 220/4000 | Multiple injection | Petrol |
2.4i | 2435 | 125(170)/6000 | In -line location: L5 | 230/4400 | Multiple injection | Petrol |
T5 | 2521 | 162(220)/5000 | In -line location: L5 | 320/1500 | Multiple injection | Petrol |
Drive and transmission
Modifications | type of drive | Type of transmission (basic) | Type of transmission (optionally) |
---|---|---|---|
1.6 d | Front-wheel drive | 5-MKPP | |
2.0 d | Front-wheel drive | 6-MKPP | |
D5 | Front-wheel drive | Sequental 5-CPP | |
1.6 | Front-wheel drive | 5-MKPP | |
1.8 | Front-wheel drive | 5-MKPP | |
2 | Front-wheel drive | 5-MKPP | |
2.4 | Front-wheel drive | 5-MKPP | 5 Speed \u200b\u200bAutomatic Transmission, |
2.4i | Front-wheel drive | 5-MKPP | 5 Speed \u200b\u200bAutomatic Transmission, |
T5 | Front-wheel drive | 6-MKPP | 5 Speed \u200b\u200bAutomatic Transmission, |
Brake system and steering wheel amplifier
Modifications | Type of front brakes | Type of rear brakes | Power steering |
---|---|---|---|
1.6 d | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
2.0 d | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
D5 | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
1.6 | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
1.8 | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
2 | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
2.4 | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
2.4i | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
T5 | Ventilated discs | Disk | there is |
The size of the tires
Modifications | The size |
---|---|
1.6 d | 195/65 R15 |
2.0 d | 205/55 R16 |
D5 | 205/55 R16 |
1.6 | 195/65 R15 |
1.8 | 195/65 R15 |
2 | 195/65R15 |
2.4 | 205/55R16 |
2.4i | 205/55 R16 |
T5 | 205/55 R16 |
Dimensions
Modifications | Length, mm | Width, mm | Height, mm | The track front/back, mm | Wheel base, mm | Road clearance (clearance), mm | Trunk volume, l |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 d | 4468 | 1770 | 1453 | 1534/1532 | 2639 | 135 | 405 |
2.0 d | 4468 | 1770 | 1453 | 1534/1532 | 2639 | 135 | 405 |
D5 | 4468 | 1770 | 1453 | 1534/1532 | 2639 | 135 | 405 |
1.6 | 4475 | 1770 | 1453 | 1534/1532 | 2639 | - | 405 |
1.8 | 4468 | 1770 | 1453 | 1534/1532 | 2639 | 135 | 405 |
2 | 4468 | 1770 | 1453 | 1534/1532 | 2639 | 135 | 405 |
2.4 | 4468 | 1770 | 1453 | 1534/1532 | 2639 | 135 | 405 |
2.4i | 4468 | 1770 | 1453 | 1534/1532 | 2639 | 135 | 405 |
T5 | 4468 | 1770 | 1453 | 1534/1532 | 2639 | 135 | 405 |
Car weight
Modifications | Equipped mass, kg | Maximum mass, kg | Lifting capacity, kg |
---|---|---|---|
1.6 d | 1288 | 1890 | 602 |
2.0 d | 1462 | 1930 | 468 |
D5 | 1422 | 2020 | 598 |
1.6 | 1224 | 1800 | 576 |
1.8 | 1269 | 1850 | 581 |
2 | 1269 | 1850 | 581 |
2.4 | 1433 | 1930 | 497 |
2.4i | 1433 | 1930 | 497 |
T5 | 1454 | 1930 | 476 |
Dynamics
Modifications | Maximum speed, km/h | Acceleration time to 100 km/h, with | CD (frontal resistance coefficient) |
---|---|---|---|
1.6 d | 190 | 12 | 0.31 |
2.0 d | 210 | 9.5 | 0.31 |
D5 | 225 | 8.5 | 0.31 |
1.6 | 185 | 11.9 | - |
1.8 | 200 | 10.9 | 0.31 |
2 | 210 | 9.5 | 0.31 |
2.4 | 205 | 9.9 | 0.31 |
2.4i | 220 | 8.2 | 0.31 |
T5 | 240 | 6.8 | 0.31 |
Fuel consumption
Modifications | In the city, l/100 km | On the highway, l/100 km | Average consumption, l/100 km | Extrication CO2, g/km | Type of fuel |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 d | 6.2 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 129 | Diesel |
2.0 d | 7.5 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 148 | Diesel |
D5 | 10 | 5.5 | 7 | 184 | Diesel |
1.6 | 9.5 | 5.8 | 7.2 | 171 | Petrol |
1.8 | 10.1 | 5.7 | 7.3 | 174 | Petrol |
2 | 10.2 | 5.7 | 7.4 | 177 | Petrol |
2.4 | 12.3 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 199 | Petrol |
2.4i | 12.4 | 6.6 | 8.5 | 203 | Petrol |
T5 | 12.5 | 6.4 | 8.5 | 208 | Petrol |
Prices Volvo S40 2004 - 2007 in Russia (updated April 22, 2016)
Modifications in G.V. | Total cars on sale (in the Russian Federation) | Average price, rubles |
Average price s Automatic transmission, rubles |
Total on sale with automatic transmission | Average price s Manual transmission, rubles |
Total on sale with manual transmission |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | 46 | 524 884 | 531 758 | 25 | 517 502 | 22 |
2006 | 92 | 558 857 | 596 713 | 35 | 534 302 | 62 |
2007 | 157 | 612 089 | 657 461 | 72 | 580 165 | 97 |
Video Crash tests Volvo S40 2004 - 2007
VOLVO S40 2004 configuration - 2007
Krash -test Volvo S40 2004 - 2007
34%
Driver and passengers
18%
Pedestrians
40%
Children-passengers
Test drives
Evil relatives
A dashing sedan, an evil turbocharged engine and a drive to all wheels are not a sign of a class, but rather a diagnosis. The person who acquires such a car (introduced it at the wheel of improvisation or evoluish?), Is obliged to pathologically love the speed and probably knows what the adrenaline has a true taste. Therefore, here to the place is both carbon and huge ...
About turbine and longevity
In any company there is at least one restless fan of German cars that does not recognize anything else. Such a character with a challenge asks: who else knows how to make real cars!? So that there is prestige, and comfort, and dynamics in general, all things. He is triumphantly confident that there will be no answer. Why won't it be? ...
Volvo for the manager
The criteria for the choice to try on the car on yourself and select a model, say, for middle -level managers of your company - these, as they say in Odessa, are two big differences. Suppose I personally prefer a 260-horsepower car from the S60 gamut, or even the S60R with a herd of 300 horses under the hood. But from the point of view of the leader ...