Crash test Chevrolet Cruze 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Labotor assessment of the safety of the car: ranking on points, test report (photo and video crash test)
Side collision with a car (8 points), and with a pillar (7.4 points)
Automobile
Pillar
Head Airbag
There is
Breast Airbag
There is
Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)
Description of the chair
Type of head restraint
Passive
Geometric assessment
0.8
Test
- Strong kick
2.4
- Middle Stick
2.2
- Weak strike
2.2
Children's passengers. Common score 41 | 84%
Child up to 18 months
Brand chair
Britax Romer Baby Safe
Front shock
Emergency Group
0, 0+
Head move forward
Protected
Location
Face back
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Fastening
ISOFIX and support belt
Chest load
Insignificant
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
12
Fixation of the head
Protected
Marking Evaluation
4
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Evaluation of fastening
2
Child older than 3 years
Brand chair
Britax Romer Duo Plus
Front shock
Emergency Group
1
Head move forward
Protected
Location
Face forward
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Fastening
ISOFIX and safety strap
Chest load
Significant
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
11.3
Fixation of the head
Protected
Marking Evaluation
4
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Evaluation of fastening
2
Assessment of car
5
Airbag Prevention Warning
Sticker with text on sunscreen visor
Pedestrians. Common score 12 | 34% System Act. Safety Common Score 5 | 71%
- Fine
- Good
- Satisfactory
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter
0 (missing)
Stability Course (ESC)
3 (in basic configuration)
Signaling about unatigned safety belts
2 (driver and passenger)
Head
6.2
Hip area.
0
Legs
6
Protection of adult passengers:
The car scored the maximum number of points for protection with a frontal impact, and mannequin sensors noted the good protection of all parts of the body. The passenger salon was deformed slightly. The windshield stand shifted back only by 5 mm. The manufacturer managed to prove that the same level of protection of the knees and thighs is provided by sedresses of various types and in various positions. For protection when hit by side, the car also got the highest assessment, however, when hitting a post, the chest protection before such a high level did not reach. Protection against injuries when hit behind a good.
Security of passenger children
Based on the testimony of the sensors of the mannequin for the protection of an 18-month passenger during the front and lateral blows of Chevrolet Cruze received the maximum number of points. The jerk forward 3-year-old head with a frontal impact was insignificant, and with the side body of both were securely fixed in their chairs. The front passenger airbag can be disabled, which allows you to install a children's chair "against the direction of movement" to this place. However, informing the driver about the status of the pillow is not clear enough. Reliably glued warnings report the danger of such an installation of a children's chair opposite the active cushion.
Protection of pedestrians
Bumper scored the maximum number of points for protecting foot pedestrians, but the front edge of the hood did not score a single score, ensuring bad protection. The surface of the hood weakly softened the child's head blow and even worse in the adult head strike places.
Protection of pedestrians
The stabilization system and alarm on the unsuccessful safety belts of the driver and the front passenger are included in the basic configuration.