technical characteristics of Renault Latitude since 2010 sedan

Technical characteristics of Renault Latitude 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: power, fuel consumption per 100 km, weight (mass), road clearance (clearance), turning radius, type of transmission and brakes, body size and tires

Engine characteristics

Modifications Engine volume, cm3 Power, kW (lp)/about Cylinders Twisting, Nm/(rpm) Type of the fuel system Type of fuel
2.0 CVT 1997 (139)/6000 In order - 4 (191)/3700 Injector Petrol
2.5 at 2495 (177)/6000 V -shaped - 6 (233)/4400 Injector Petrol

Drive and transmission

Modifications type of drive Type of transmission (basic) Type of transmission (optionally)
2.0 CVT Front-wheel drive Variable speed drive
2.5 at Front-wheel drive 6-ACPP

Suspension type and turning radius

Modifications Front suspension Rear suspension The diameter of the turn, m
2.0 CVT Independent - Mcpherson Independent - multi -link 11.2
2.5 at Independent - Mcpherson Independent - multi -link 11.2

Brake system and steering wheel amplifier

Modifications Type of front brakes Type of rear brakes Power steering
2.0 CVT Disk ventilated Disk -
2.5 at Disk ventilated Disk -

The size of the tires

Modifications The size
2.0 CVT Front wheels: 215/55 R16, rear wheels: 215/55 R16
2.5 at Front wheels: 215/60 R16, rear wheels: 215/60 R16

Dimensions

Modifications Length, mm Width, mm Height, mm The track front/back, mm Wheel base, mm Road clearance (clearance), mm Trunk volume, l
2.0 CVT 4887 1832 1483 -/- 2762 127 477/-
2.5 at 4887 1832 1483 -/- 2762 127 477/-

Car weight

Modifications Equipped mass, kg Maximum mass, kg Lifting capacity, kg
2.0 CVT 1495 2050 555
2.5 at 1600 2110 510

Number of seats and doors

Modifications The number of seats Number of doors
2.0 CVT 5 4
2.5 at 5 4

The volume of the fuel tank

Modifications Tank volume, l Type of fuel
2.0 CVT 70 AI-95
2.5 at 70 AI-95

Dynamics

Modifications Maximum speed, km/h Acceleration time to 100 km/h, with CD (frontal resistance coefficient)
2.0 CVT 186 11.9 -
2.5 at 209 10.7 -

Fuel consumption

Modifications In the city, l/100 km On the highway, l/100 km Average consumption, l/100 km Extrication CO2, g/km Type of fuel
2.0 CVT 11 7 8.3 - Petrol
2.5 at 13.4 7.7 9.7 - Petrol

Renault Latitude prices since 2010 in Russia (updated on April 22, 2016)

Modifications in G.V. Total cars on sale (in the Russian Federation) Average price,
rubles
Average price s
Automatic transmission, rubles
Total on sale with automatic transmission Average price s
Manual transmission, rubles
Total on sale with manual transmission
2010
22 900 258 904 380 22 574 671 6
2 l 10 864 419 864 419 10 - 6
2.5 l 9 983 617 983 617 9 - 6
2011
25 952 168 953 591 25 - 6
2.0 l 7 843 001 843 001 7 - 6
2012
22 1 219 035 1 215 590 21 1 336 098 6
2.0 l 6 889 315 889 315 6 - 6
2013
57 1 399 244 1 401 181 57 1 280 724 7
2.0 l 7 1 266 705 1 266 705 7 - 6

Video test drives Renault Latitude since 2010

Configuration Renault Latitude since 2010

Test drives

From dirt to City
The heroes of this test are united by what they desperately want to break with their predecessors. Renault Vel Satis and Peugeot 407 with a bang lost a market struggle, and Kia Magentis was known as the favorite of the proletarians, not white collarbone. Will Renault Latitude, Peugeot 508 and Kia Optima will succeed from getting out of dirt to City? Peugeot 508 glorious ...
Office plankton. 6 business class sedanov
Karelia. In Karelia, great! And that is why we organize our own, already the third in a row, it is on it. But if at the first time we risked to meddle there on crossovers, then this time we decided to visit this beautiful corner of our Motherland, we decided it easier on cars on the sedans of the business class, Testamazda 6 ...
The color of "sofas"
Skilling science is small in cars. Although no great automobile journalist, of course, is recognized in this. All these elusively subtle matters of the differences between, say, crossover and SUV were invented with one purpose to hang the marketing noodles on the ears of ordinary mortals as much as possible. In fact, there is a much more understandable approach ...