technical characteristics of Mitsubishi Outlander XL since 2009 SUV
Technical characteristics Mitsubishi Outlander (Airtrek) 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Power, fuel consumption per 100 km, weight (mass), road clearance (clearance), radius of reversal, type of transmission and brakes, body and tire sizes and tires
Engine characteristics
| Modifications |
Engine volume, cm3 |
Power, kW (lp)/about |
Cylinders |
Twisting, Nm/(rpm) |
Type of the fuel system |
Type of fuel |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
1998 |
(147)/6000 |
In order - 4 |
(199)/4200 |
Injector |
Petrol |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
1998 |
(147)/6000 |
In order - 4 |
(199)/4200 |
Injector |
Petrol |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
1998 |
(147)/6000 |
In order - 4 |
(199)/4200 |
Injector |
Petrol |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
2360 |
(170)/6000 |
In order - 4 |
(232)/4100 |
Injector |
Petrol |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
2998 |
(223)/6250 |
V -shaped - 6 |
(284)/3750 |
Injector |
Petrol |
Drive and transmission
| Modifications |
type of drive |
Type of transmission (basic) |
Type of transmission (optionally) |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
Front-wheel drive |
Variable speed drive |
|
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
4x4 (all -wheel drive) |
Variable speed drive |
|
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
Front-wheel drive |
5-MKPP |
|
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
4x4 (all -wheel drive) |
Variable speed drive |
|
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
4x4 (all -wheel drive) |
6-ACPP |
|
Suspension type and turning radius
| Modifications |
Front suspension |
Rear suspension |
The diameter of the turn, m |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
Independent - Mcpherson |
Dependent - bridge on springs |
14.4 |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
Independent - Mcpherson |
Dependent - bridge on springs |
14.4 |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
Independent - Mcpherson |
Dependent - bridge on springs |
14.4 |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
Independent - Mcpherson |
Half -dependent - torsion beam |
11.3 |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
Independent - Mcpherson |
Independent - multi -link |
- |
Brake system and steering wheel amplifier
| Modifications |
Type of front brakes |
Type of rear brakes |
Power steering |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
Disk ventilated |
Disk |
Hydraulic |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
Disk ventilated |
Disk |
Hydraulic |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
Disk ventilated |
Disk |
Hydraulic |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
Disk ventilated |
Disk |
Hydraulic |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
Disk ventilated |
Disk |
Hydraulic |
The size of the tires
| Modifications |
The size |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
Front wheels: 215/70 R16, rear wheels: 215/70 R16 |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
Front wheels: 215/70 R16, rear wheels: 215/70 R16 |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
Front wheels: 215/70 R16, rear wheels: 215/70 R16 |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
Front wheels: 215/70 R16, rear wheels: 215/70 R16 |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
Front wheels: 225/55 R18, rear wheels: 225/55 R18 |
Dimensions
| Modifications |
Length, mm |
Width, mm |
Height, mm |
The track front/back, mm |
Wheel base, mm |
Road clearance (clearance), mm |
Trunk volume, l |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
4665 |
1800 |
1720 |
1540/1540 |
2670 |
215 |
774/1691 |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
4665 |
1800 |
1720 |
1540/1540 |
2670 |
215 |
774/1691 |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
4665 |
1800 |
1720 |
1540/1540 |
2670 |
215 |
774/1691 |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
4665 |
1800 |
1720 |
1540/1540 |
2670 |
215 |
774/1691 |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
4665 |
1800 |
1720 |
1540/1540 |
2670 |
215 |
774/1691 |
Car weight
| Modifications |
Equipped mass, kg |
Maximum mass, kg |
Lifting capacity, kg |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
1540 |
2070 |
530 |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
1569 |
2070 |
501 |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
1474 |
2070 |
596 |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
1598 |
2290 |
692 |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
1645 |
2350 |
705 |
Number of seats and doors
| Modifications |
The number of seats |
Number of doors |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
5 |
5 |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
5 |
5 |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
5 |
5 |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
5 |
5 |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
5 |
5 |
The volume of the fuel tank
| Modifications |
Tank volume, l |
Type of fuel |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
63 |
AI-95 |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
63 |
AI-95 |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
63 |
AI-95 |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
63 |
AI-95 |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
60 |
AI-95 |
Dynamics
| Modifications |
Maximum speed, km/h |
Acceleration time to 100 km/h, with |
CD (frontal resistance coefficient) |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
180 |
12.2 |
- |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
180 |
12.3 |
- |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
184 |
10.8 |
- |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
190 |
10.8 |
- |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
200 |
9.7 |
- |
Fuel consumption
| Modifications |
In the city, l/100 km |
On the highway, l/100 km |
Average consumption, l/100 km |
Extrication CO2, g/km |
Type of fuel |
| 2.0 CVT 4x2 |
10.3 |
6.6 |
8 |
- |
Petrol |
| 2.0 CVT 4x4 |
10.6 |
7 |
8.3 |
- |
Petrol |
| 2.0 MT 4x2 |
10.5 |
6.8 |
8.1 |
- |
Petrol |
| 2.4 CVT 4x4 |
12.6 |
7.5 |
9.3 |
- |
Petrol |
| 3.0 AT 4x4 |
15.1 |
8 |
10.6 |
- |
Petrol |
Video Crash tests Mitsubishi Outlander XL since 2009
Video Test Drive Mitsubishi Outlander XL since 2009
Test drives
Problem of choice. Need SUV up to € 30,000
Alexey Alekseevich Ivanov, 65 years old, pensioner, driving experience 44 years. He wants: Crossover. Budget: 30,000 yubiles are not only a fun feast and tears of tenderness, these are also gifts. As a gift from his son, our reader received the amount for the acquisition of a SUV, and in order to spend it wisely, I decided to contact us. Given the preferences, ...
Mitsubishi Outlander again received a 3-liter engine and an honest automatic transmission
The old acquaintance returned. A three -liter Outlander XL appeared on the market again ... The crisis ended, and the automobile market quickly rushed to new sales records. The frightened residents of Russian cities slowly climbed from financial pits and ...... barely receiving the first post -crisis fees, immediately rushed to car dealerships. When the Marketing Director of the Russian representative office Mitsubishi illustrated us volumes ...
Incompatibility of characters
Each of these Japanese SUVs separately has a lot of advantages. Aggressive fashionable appearance, modern all -wheel drive, powerful motors and even an acceptable price for so many advantages. But whose trump cards will be stronger in a full -time dispute? Many people today, looking for not too expensive a Japanese SUV, choose precisely between Mitsubishi and Mazda. Moreover ...
