specifications Honda CR-V since 2009 SUV
Specifications Honda CR-V 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Power, fuel consumption 100 km, weight (weight), road clearance (clearance), radius of reversal, type of transmission and brakes, body sizes and tires
Engine characteristics
Modifications |
Engine volume, cm3 |
Power, kW (hp) / about |
Cylinders |
Torque, nm / (rpm) |
Type of fuel system |
Type of fuel |
2.2 i-CTDI |
2204 |
104(140)/4000 |
L4 (inline location) |
340/2000 |
COMMON RAIL. |
Diesel |
2,0 I-VTEC |
1997 |
112(150)/6200 |
L4 (inline location) |
193/4200 |
Multipoint injection |
Petrol |
2.4 i-VTEC |
2354 |
134(180)/6800 |
L4 (inline location) |
218/4400 |
Multipoint injection |
Petrol |
2.0 AT |
1997 |
(150)/6200 |
Inline - 4. |
(192)/4200 |
Injector |
Petrol |
2.0 Mt. |
1997 |
(150)/6200 |
Inline - 4. |
(192)/4200 |
Injector |
Petrol |
2.4 AT. |
2354 |
(166)/5800 |
Inline - 4. |
(220)/4200 |
Injector |
Petrol |
Drive and Transmission
Modifications |
type of drive |
Transmission type (basic) |
Transmission type (optional) |
2.2 i-CTDI |
4x4 (four-wheel drive) |
6-MCP |
|
2,0 I-VTEC |
4x4 (four-wheel drive) |
6-MCP |
5-automatic |
2.4 i-VTEC |
Front-wheel drive |
5-automatic |
|
2.0 AT |
4x4 (four-wheel drive) |
5-automatic |
|
2.0 Mt. |
4x4 (four-wheel drive) |
6-MCP |
|
2.4 AT. |
4x4 (four-wheel drive) |
5-automatic |
|
Type of suspension and reversal radius
Modifications |
Front suspension |
Rear suspension |
Diameter of reversal, m |
2.0 AT |
Independent - multi-list |
Independent - multi-list |
- |
2.0 Mt. |
Independent - multi-list |
Independent - multi-list |
- |
2.4 AT. |
Independent - multi-list |
Independent - multi-list |
- |
Brake system and power steering
Modifications |
Type of front brakes |
Type of rear brakes |
Power steering |
2.2 i-CTDI |
Ventilated discs |
Disk |
there is |
2,0 I-VTEC |
Ventilated discs |
Disk |
there is |
2.4 i-VTEC |
Ventilated discs |
Disk |
there is |
2.0 AT |
Disk ventilated |
Disk |
Electric |
2.0 Mt. |
Disk ventilated |
Disk |
Electric |
2.4 AT. |
Disk ventilated |
Disk |
Electric |
Tire size
Modifications |
The size |
2.2 i-CTDI |
225/65 R17 |
2,0 I-VTEC |
225/65 R17 |
2.4 i-VTEC |
225/65 R17 |
2.0 AT |
Front wheels: 225/65 R17, rear wheels: 225/65 R17 |
2.0 Mt. |
Front wheels: 225/65 R17, rear wheels: 225/65 R17 |
2.4 AT. |
Front wheels: 225/60 R18, rear wheels: 225/60 R18 |
Dimensions
Modifications |
Length, mm. |
Width, mm. |
Height, mm. |
Front track / rear, mm |
Wheel base, mm |
Road clearance (clearance), mm |
The volume of the trunk, l |
2.2 i-CTDI |
4529 |
1819 |
1676 |
1565/1565 |
2629 |
185 |
555/954 |
2,0 I-VTEC |
4529 |
1819 |
1676 |
1565/1565 |
2629 |
185 |
555/954 |
2.4 i-VTEC |
4529 |
1819 |
1676 |
1565/1565 |
2629 |
170 |
555/954 |
2.0 AT |
4574 |
1820 |
1675 |
1565/1565 |
2620 |
185 |
556/- |
2.0 Mt. |
4574 |
1820 |
1675 |
1565/1565 |
2620 |
185 |
556/- |
2.4 AT. |
4574 |
1820 |
1675 |
1565/1565 |
2620 |
185 |
556/- |
Car weight
Modifications |
Curb weight, kg |
Maximum mass, kg |
Load capacity, kg. |
2.2 i-CTDI |
1660 |
2160 |
500 |
2,0 I-VTEC |
1543 |
2050 |
507 |
2.4 i-VTEC |
1536 |
- |
- |
2.0 AT |
1498 |
2080 |
582 |
2.0 Mt. |
1498 |
2050 |
552 |
2.4 AT. |
1595 |
2080 |
485 |
Number of seats and doors
Modifications |
Number of seats |
Number of doors |
2.0 AT |
5 |
5 |
2.0 Mt. |
5 |
5 |
2.4 AT. |
5 |
5 |
Volume of fuel tank
Modifications |
Tank volume, l |
Type of fuel |
2.0 AT |
58 |
AI-95 |
2.0 Mt. |
58 |
AI-95 |
2.4 AT. |
58 |
AI-95 |
Dynamics
Modifications |
Maximum speed, km / h |
Overclocking time up to 100 km / h, with |
CD (frontal resistance coefficient) |
2.2 i-CTDI |
187 |
10.3 |
- |
2,0 I-VTEC |
190 |
10.2 |
- |
2.4 i-VTEC |
- |
- |
- |
2.0 AT |
177 |
12.2 |
- |
2.0 Mt. |
190 |
10.2 |
- |
2.4 AT. |
190 |
10 |
- |
Fuel consumption
Modifications |
In the city, l / 100 km |
On the highway, l / 100 km |
Average consumption, l / 100 km |
CO2 release, g / km |
Type of fuel |
2.2 i-CTDI |
8.1 |
5.7 |
6.5 |
173 |
Diesel |
2,0 I-VTEC |
10.4 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
192-195 |
Petrol |
2.4 i-VTEC |
11.2 |
8.4 |
9.8 |
- |
Petrol |
2.0 AT |
10.9 |
6.7 |
8.2 |
- |
Petrol |
2.0 Mt. |
10.4 |
6.7 |
8.1 |
- |
Petrol |
2.4 AT. |
13.1 |
7.4 |
9.5 |
- |
Petrol |
Honda CR-V prices since 2009 in Russia (updated April 22, 2016)
Modifications in G.V. |
Total cars for sale (in the Russian Federation) |
Average price, rubles |
The average price of S. Automatic transmission, rubles |
Total for sale with automatic transmission |
The average price of S. MCPP, rubles |
Total for sale with manual transmission |
2010 |
48 |
1 181 737 |
1 180 834 |
46 |
1 234 093 |
7 |
2 L. |
8 |
1 155 445 |
1 155 890 |
8 |
1 151 266 |
6 |
2.0 L. |
8 |
1 088 477 |
1 088 347 |
8 |
1 026 199 |
6 |
2.2 L. |
7 |
1 295 492 |
1 297 402 |
7 |
1 282 099 |
6 |
2.4 L. |
35 |
1 193 365 |
1 191 640 |
31 |
1 342 595 |
6 |
2011 |
46 |
1 281 501 |
1 286 360 |
37 |
1 230 809 |
7 |
2 L. |
20 |
1 217 759 |
1 205 215 |
16 |
1 243 401 |
7 |
2.0 L. |
8 |
1 244 282 |
1 248 489 |
7 |
1 180 431 |
6 |
2.3 L. |
6 |
1 244 252 |
1 244 252 |
6 |
- |
6 |
2.4 L. |
22 |
1 334 017 |
1 335 981 |
22 |
- |
6 |
2012 |
37 |
1 475 499 |
1 475 117 |
35 |
1 481 525 |
7 |
2 L. |
20 |
1 426 716 |
1 423 864 |
20 |
1 432 185 |
6 |
2.0 L. |
7 |
1 370 555 |
1 370 555 |
7 |
- |
6 |
2.4 L. |
20 |
1 536 270 |
1 542 086 |
20 |
1 484 770 |
6 |
2013 |
48 |
1 635 790 |
1 686 501 |
35 |
1 462 726 |
10 |
2 L. |
22 |
1 569 194 |
1 609 974 |
20 |
1 469 949 |
8 |
2.0 L. |
8 |
1 543 701 |
1 591 200 |
7 |
1 464 092 |
7 |
2.4 L. |
20 |
1 767 389 |
1 779 643 |
20 |
1 153 188 |
6 |
Video crash tests Honda CR-V since 2009
Video Test Drives Honda CR-V since 2009
Honda CR-V configuration since 2009
Test drive
Foreleg, sit down, two!
Fantastic Four. Will the fully updated Hyundai Tucson exceed the standard (Honda CR-V), a beginner from GM (GMC Terrain) and a winner (Subaru Forester)? In May 2008, when we were last compared compact crossovers with four-cylinder atmospheric engines, fully new Subaru Forester Third Generation deftly bypassed all his rivals: Honda CR-V, Nissan ...
Test Drive Honda CR-V: Family friend
When the choice of the car is due to the number of children and the functionality of the car, the view himself highlights the CR-V from the crowd of competitors. The Journalists also say that the car needs to be chosen based on the functions that it will perform. Like, if I need to go home on it and to work, it will be one car, and ...
How does Ford Escape better than the leader of the sales of Honda CR-V?
Simple American Ford Escape came to break the Japanese garden ... The accuracy of the crossovers is traditionally the country of the rising sun. Quality, balanced prices and the optimal set of consumer qualities. If not to take a premium segment, then the Japanese fortress was and remains unreasonable. And when all this was done with this, from where I either hurt appeared Ford Escape, made in Thailand, and said: ...