Crash Test Toyota Avensis Universal 1997 - 2000 Universal
Toyota Avensis Crash Test Universal 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000: Laboratory Car Safety Assessment: Rankings in points, test report (photo and video crash test)
23%
Driver and passengers
16%
Pedestrians
Protection of the driver and passenger
Frosting, driver |
Front punch, passenger |
Side blow, driver |
|
Children's holding devices
Child up to 18 months | No information |
Child older than 3 years | No information |
Pedestrian safety
|
Comments:
The production of Avensis began after the publication of the report on the tests of family cars in July 1997, but the manufacturer financed the holding of a new test to compare this car with competitors. Even without side airbags, protection when hitting the side was best in this class, meets the requirements of 1998. The front airbags provided head protection, but the load on the chest was high. Protection of pedestrian heads was better than average, but the bumper turned out to be traumatic.Front punch:
With a frontal impact, the passenger salon was deformed slightly, all the doors opened and closed normally. Front airbags provided stable contact with the heads of the front seds. The load on the chest driver from the seat belt led to a decrease in the assessment. Hard elements around the steering column pose a threat to the knees, the top of the feet and the driver's pelvis. Some protection in this area provides a protective pad in the casing of the steering column, which closes the column lock. Displacement back brake pedals limits a special bracket.Security of passenger children:
The seat belts of the extreme seats of the seats are used to secure children's chairs, the instructions for their use are placed on the belts themselves. Pictogram and two text warnings inform about the inadmissibility of the installation of a children's armchair in the front seat due to the presence of an anterior airbag. The manufacturer recommended by the manufacturer are compatible with seat belts, they well controlled movement of the heads of children ahead with a frontal impact, however, at the side of the senior, the older was not kept within the chair.Side strike:
Despite the lack of side airbags, the protection of the chest driver was normal. The design of the seats should not allow the driver's blow to the door and the central rack. The protection of the abdominal department was recognized as good.Pedestrian safety:
Half of the head of the child's head of the child corresponded to security requirements, two showed weak protection, and one is bad. Adult Head Protection turned out to be better than average. Two control points on the front edge of the bumper badly softened the blow.General information about the car
Roelf location | On right |
Tested model | Toyota Avensis 1.6 s |
Body type | 4-door sedan |
Year of publishing data | 1998 |
Curb weight | 1255 |
Installation Systems:
Pretensels of front seat belts | There is |
Front Belts Load Loaders | There is |
Driver Front Airbag | There is |
Passenger Front Airbag | There is |
Side airbags | No |
Side Head Airbags | No |
Driver's knees and feet airbag | No |