Crash Test Toyota Avensis Universal 1997 - 2000 Universal

Toyota Avensis Crash Test Universal 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000: Laboratory Car Safety Assessment: Rankings in points, test report (photo and video crash test)
23%
Driver and passengers
16%
Pedestrians

Protection of the driver and passenger

driver Damage at Lobby
Frosting, driver
passenger Damage at Lobby
Front punch, passenger
driver damage with lateral impact
Side blow, driver
Fine - Fine
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months No information
Child older than 3 years No information

Pedestrian safety

the result of the crash test is excellent - Fine
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is satisfactory - Satisfactorily

Comments:

The production of Avensis began after the publication of the report on the tests of family cars in July 1997, but the manufacturer financed the holding of a new test to compare this car with competitors. Even without side airbags, protection when hitting the side was best in this class, meets the requirements of 1998. The front airbags provided head protection, but the load on the chest was high. Protection of pedestrian heads was better than average, but the bumper turned out to be traumatic.

Front punch:

With a frontal impact, the passenger salon was deformed slightly, all the doors opened and closed normally. Front airbags provided stable contact with the heads of the front seds. The load on the chest driver from the seat belt led to a decrease in the assessment. Hard elements around the steering column pose a threat to the knees, the top of the feet and the driver's pelvis. Some protection in this area provides a protective pad in the casing of the steering column, which closes the column lock. Displacement back brake pedals limits a special bracket.

Security of passenger children:

The seat belts of the extreme seats of the seats are used to secure children's chairs, the instructions for their use are placed on the belts themselves. Pictogram and two text warnings inform about the inadmissibility of the installation of a children's armchair in the front seat due to the presence of an anterior airbag. The manufacturer recommended by the manufacturer are compatible with seat belts, they well controlled movement of the heads of children ahead with a frontal impact, however, at the side of the senior, the older was not kept within the chair.

Side strike:

Despite the lack of side airbags, the protection of the chest driver was normal. The design of the seats should not allow the driver's blow to the door and the central rack. The protection of the abdominal department was recognized as good.

Pedestrian safety:

Half of the head of the child's head of the child corresponded to security requirements, two showed weak protection, and one is bad. Adult Head Protection turned out to be better than average. Two control points on the front edge of the bumper badly softened the blow.

General information about the car

Roelf location On right
Tested model Toyota Avensis 1.6 s
Body type 4-door sedan
Year of publishing data 1998
Curb weight 1255

Installation Systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is
Front Belts Load Loaders There is
Driver Front Airbag There is
Passenger Front Airbag There is
Side airbags No
Side Head Airbags No
Driver's knees and feet airbag No

Photo crash test