Driver and passengers. Total score 26 | 72%
Frosting (9.8 points)
Driver |
Passenger |
| - | Fine |
| - | Good |
| - | Satisfactorily |
| - | Badly |
| - | Very bad |
|
|
Head |
Driver's Head Contact with Airbag | unstable |
Passenger's head contact with airbag | stable |
Breast |
Passenger branch | stable |
Displacement front rack back | 43mm. |
Shift steering wheel back | 35mm. |
Shift steering wheel up | 7mm. |
Chest contact with steering wheel | no |
Top of legs, knees and hip area |
Contact with firm elements of the front panel | steering column with position lock and panel |
Knees | steering column with position lock and panel |
Lower leg and foot |
Foot recess compression | no |
Displacement pedals back | brake pedal - 94mm |
Pedal shift top | no |
|
Side collision with car (8 points), and with post (6.1 points)
Automobile |
Pillar |
|
Head Airbag | yes |
Breast Airbag | yes |
|
Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)
|
Description of the chair | Standard, manual adjustment in 4 positions |
Type of head restraint | passive |
Geometric assessment | 1 |
Test |
- Strong kick | 1,9 |
- Middle Stick | 1,6 |
- Weak strike | 0 |
|
Children's passengers. Common score 41 | 83%
Child up to 18 months |
Brand chair | ritax R. | Front shock |
Emergency Group | 0, 0+ | Head move forward | protected |
Location | face back | Scald acceleration | maximum rating |
Fastening | ISOFIX Mounting and Support Frame | Chest load | weak |
Side strike |
| Evaluation of protection | 10,8 | Fixation of the head | protected |
Marking Evaluation | 4 | Scald acceleration | max Evaluation |
Evaluation of fastening | 2 | |
Child older than 3 years |
Brand chair | ritax R. | Front shock |
Emergency Group | 1 | Head move forward | protected |
Location | face forward | Scald acceleration | maximum rating |
Fastening | ISOFIX fastening with a safety cable | Chest load | maximum rating |
Side strike |
| Evaluation of protection | 12 | Fixation of the head | protected |
Marking Evaluation | 4 | Scald acceleration | max Evaluation |
Evaluation of fastening | 2 | |
Assessment of car | 6 | Airbag Prevention Warning | Warning on a sunny visor |
Pedestrians. Common score 13 | 37% System Act. Safety Common Score 6 | 84%
- Fine
|
- Good
|
- Satisfactory
|
|
|
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter | active, standard |
Stability Course (ESC) | 3 |
Signaling about unatigned safety belts | Two: Driver and Front Passenger |
Head | 7,2 |
Hip area | 0,1 |
Legs | 6 |
|
Protection of adult passengers:
With a frontal impact, the Renault Fluence Ze passenger salon retained the integrity, however, there was an insufficient pressure in the driver's safety pillow, which prevented preventing the head of the head with the rim of the steering wheel through the pillow fabric. For this car was fined, and the manufacturer told Euroncap that he would examine this question in more detail and makes the necessary changes. The structure of the dashboard was the danger to the knees and the hips of the front passenger and the driver. In the side of the lateral collision with overlapping, the protection of the chest received the estimate - well, the protection of other parts of the body is excellent. In a more severe side collision with the post, the protection of the chest was recognized as very weak. In the test for protection against the injuries of the cervical spine and the occipital part of the head in a collision of the back is recognized as critical. After each test, the electric vehicle was checked on the possibility of human damage to electric current, as well as the possibility of fire due to a short circuit, based on the results of which signs of danger were not detected.
Security of passenger children
Based on the research of the conducted tests, Fluence Ze scored the maximum number of points for the protection of a 3-year mannequin. The displacement of the mannequin forward as a result of the strike was not significant, and with the lateral collision, the mannequins were well retained by fixing children's chairs. The risk of head injury is minimal. The front passenger airbag has a functional possibility of shutdown, for transportation in the front seat of children in special chairs facing back. Information indicating the functional status of the pillow is not clear enough, nevertheless, there is clear information about the danger of the carriage of children in the special circles facing the face back when the airbag featured.
Protection of pedestrians
In pedestrian safety tests, the maximum number of balls scored the bumpers of the car, they provided pedestrian legs with good protection. The hood showed weak safety in places of possible contact of an electric vehicle with adult and child heads. In addition, the front edge of the hood showed insufficient safety in the field of the top of the legs and pelvis pelvis.
Protection of pedestrians
Car Stability System (ESC) is standard equipment and meets the expectative requirements of Euroncap. The reminder of the non-unspecified driver safety belts and the passenger is also standard for this car. The system of forced speed limit is not a mandatory function in many of the equipment, but as expected in the future, the requirement for its presence will be regulated much more stricter.
General information about the car
Tested model |
Renault Fluence Ze, 'Expression', model with left tower |
Body type |
sedan |
Year of data publishing |
2011 |
Curb weight, kg |
1569 kg |
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... |
applicable to all models Fluence ZE of this generation |
Safety systems:
Pretensels of front seat belts |
double pretensioner |
Front Belts Load Loaders |
There is |
Driver Front Airbag |
Single-stage |
Passenger Front Airbag |
Single-stage |
Side airbags |
There is |
Side Head Airbags |
There is |
Driver's knees airbag |
No |
Dynamic stabilization system |
There is |
Reminder of non-profitable safety belts |
Driver and Front Passenger Places |