Crash test Proton Waja / Impian since 2001 sedan

Protection of the driver and passenger

Frontal blow, driver

Loba blow, passenger

Side blow, driver

- Excellent - Good - Satisfactorily - Badly - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months	Britax Club Class Extra, face back
A child over 3 years old	Kiddy-Life Universal, face forward

Safety of pedestrians

- Excellent - Good - Satisfactorily

Comments:

Proton positions Impian as the first car of the new generation created in accordance with EURO NCAP standards. However, during the frontal impact, he did not justify the hope of experts, and the protection of pedestrians was also weak. The results were disappointed, but the manufacturer promised to improve protection in subsequent models. The car body was significantly deformed when hit. The driver and front passenger risked getting serious damage. Children's chairs worked poorly, and it became obvious that when developing a car of this part, they paid a little attention. Impian exists only in the right -handed version, therefore, among European countries, its sale was carried out only in the UK.

Frontal blow:

The body was badly damaged, and both front riders risked getting chest injuries due to high loads. Passive safety systems were to protect better than it really was. In the front panel, solid elements were also found, which can lead to injury when hitting them. The deepening of the driver’s legs crumple greatly, increasing the danger to his legs. The central place of the back row of seats is equipped with a three -point seat belt that provides better protection compared to waist.

Safety of passenger children:

The 18-month passenger was located in the chair “Against the direction of movement”, and the 3-year-old in the chair “In the direction of movement”. Both chairs were recommended by the manufacturer, but not one of them defended the head of his passenger with a frontal or lateral blow. A warning about the possibility of applying a heavy or fatal injury when installing a children's chair “Against the direction of movement” at the site of the front passenger did not meet the requirements. They were made in the form of a sticker on the outer side of the sunscreen and icon on the front panel from the passenger. Moreover, the latter, by virtue of its design, can easily mislead.

Side blow:

Protection with a lateral blow was pretty good. However, the load on the chest could lead to injury, although the protection of the pelvic and abdominal parts was normal.

Pedestrian safety:

The protection of pedestrians best describes the word “terrible”. The manufacturer put EURO NCAP experts regarding the fact that the car was developed without taking into account this factor, but in the future he promised to correct the situation.

General information about the car

The location of the steering wheel	On right
Tested model	Proton Impian 1.6 GX
Type of body	4-door sedan
Year of data publication	2002
Curb weight	1230
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ...	For all UK Impian

Safety system equipment:

Front seat belts	There is
Front seat belts load limiters	There is
Front Pillow of Safety of the driver	There is
Passenger front pillow	There is
Side airbags	There is
Side pillows of head safety pillows	Not
Knee -off pillow and legs of the driver	Not