Crash test Peugeot 406 coupe 2003 - 2004 coupe

PEUGEOT 406 Crack Test 2003, 2004: Laboratory Car Safety Assessment: Ball Rating, Test Report (Photo and Video Crash test)
18%
Driver and passengers
14%
Pedestrians

Protection of the driver and passenger

driver Damage at Lobby Shoot
Frosting, driver
passenger Damage at Lobby
Front Punch, Passenger
driver damage with lateral impact
Side blow, driver
Fine - Fine
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months Roemer Prince, face forward
Child older than 3 years Roemer Prince, face forward

Safety pedestrians

the result of the crash test is excellent - Fine
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is satisfactory - Satisfactorily

Comments:

The first test of the 406th model took place in 1997. Then the car scored two stars for protection during front and side shocks. Model 2001 received one star more, mainly due to improved passive safety systems, as well as due to the enhanced body design. The ignition key can be turned off the front passenger airbag, which allows you to install the children's chair "against the direction of movement" in its place. In addition, the pillow can be turned off when the engine running using the second key. The warning on the instrument panel constantly reflects the actual status of the pillow, thus ensuring safety.

Front punch:

The body was significantly deformed, and the driver's head had no constant contact with the airbag. The torpedo contains rigid elements that can damage their knees or the hips of the driver. In addition, the niche for the legs was deformed, and the danger arose for his feet. The three-point seat belt for the central sequence rear seen provides better protection compared to the waist.

Security of passenger children:

The front airbag enters the basic configuration of Peugeot 406, so there is a risk of serious or mortal damage for a child placed in this place in the children's chair "against the direction of movement". There were no warnings regarding this in the car's cabin. A cushion switch is installed in the car. In the test, the chairs "in the direction of movement" were used. Basically, they defended their saddles, although a 3-year-old child and ended with the risk of head damage to the side of the overlap.

Side strike:

The behavior of the car with lateral impact was unsatisfactory, the head of the head and chest caused the greatest anxiety. Although the side airbags must also protect the head of passengers, the driver's pillow could not do this. Also, it did not reveal completely, reducing the size of the protective surface and not preventing the contact of the abdominal department with the door panel.

Pedestrian safety:

The front of the car was very hurt in the foot impact zone, although some scalp points provided mitigation. The manufacturer should pay more attention to protect pedestrians.

General information about the car

Roelf location Left
Tested model Peugeot 406 1.8E 16V
Body type 4-door sedan
Year of data publishing 2001
Curb weight 1315
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... VF38BRHZF81365797.

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is
Front Belts Load Loaders There is
Driver Front Airbag There is
Passenger Front Airbag There is
Side airbags There is
Side Head Airbags There is
Driver's knees and feet airbag No

Photo crash test