PEUGEOT 307 CC 2003 Crash Test - 2005 convertible
PEUGEOT 307 CC Krash Test 2003, 2004, 2005: Laborator Assessment of the Car Safety: Rating in points, report on the test (photo and video of the crash test)
29%
Driver and passengers
10%
Pedestrians
Protection of the driver and passenger
Frontal blow, driver |
Loba blow, passenger |
Side blow, driver |
|
Children's holding devices
Child up to 18 months | Britax Roemer Duo, facing forward |
A child over 3 years old | Britax Roemer Duo, facing forward |
Safety of pedestrians
|
Comments:
The 307th has a strong security frame of a passenger salon, not damaged as a result of a collision and defending passengers. The bottom also retained its shape. However, the driver runs the risk of getting a serious knee injury due to contact with the steering column and the ignition lock. Protection of children is recognized as effective, although there is a risk of neck damage for an 18-month passenger. Pedestrian protection is average.Frontal blow:
When impact, the roof of the car was removed to get the worst result. The body turned out to be very durable, the examination after the blow did not reveal deformation in the area of \u200b\u200bthe thresholds and racks, which helped to keep the loads on the chest cells at a low level. The deepening for the legs remained almost unharmed, protecting the driver's feet. However, he risked damaging his knees and in contact with the steering column and the ignition lock, although no more threats were found in this zone. The front seat belts are equipped with pretense and load limiters, which reduces the risk of passenger injury.Safety of passenger children:
Both children's seats were located “in the direction of movement” in the ISOFIX mounts, there were no upper mounts. The heads were safe with both types of blows, but the junior passenger risked damaging his neck. The front passenger airbag is equipped with a manual switch. The icon and text message on the edge of the front panel and the visible side of the sunscreen visor indicate the presence of the switch. However, they do not mention the possibility of obtaining severe or fatal injury when installing a children's chair “against the direction of movement” opposite the active airbag.Side blow:
With a lateral blow, the roof was raised. This is done to check the probability of a driver’s head strike against her. The airbags in chairs were prevented well protected by the driver, although the load on the chest was slightly larger than the norm due to contact with the airbag and side support of the seat.Pedestrian safety:
Protection in places of impact of the head of an adult or child was weak. The bumper and the front edge of the hood practically did not soften the blow when hitting a pedestrian.General information about the car
The location of the steering wheel | Left |
Tested model | Peugeot 307 CC 2.0 16V |
Type of body | Cabriolet |
Year of data publication | 2003 |
Curb weight | 1466 |
Safety system equipment:
Front seat belts | There is |
Front seat belts load limiters | There is |
Front Pillow of Safety of the driver | There is |
Passenger front pillow | There is |
Side airbags | There is |
Side pillows of head safety pillows | There is |
Knee -off pillow and legs of the driver | Not |