Krash Test Nissan Primera Stags 1998 - 1999 Stag

Krash Test Nissan Primera Break 1998, 1999: Laborator Assessment of the Car Safety: Rating in points, report on the test (photo and video of the crash test)
19%
Driver and passengers
10%
Pedestrians

Protection of the driver and passenger

damage to the driver during a frontal impact
Frontal blow, driver
damage to the passenger during the frontal impact
Loba blow, passenger
damage to the driver during a lateral strike
Side blow, driver
Excellent - Excellent
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months No information
A child over 3 years old No information

Safety of pedestrians

the result of the crash test is excellent - Excellent
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is less - Satisfactorily

Comments:

The Primera generation, the release of which began in October 1996, earned three stars behind the frontal and lateral strikes. During the frontal blow, the car proved itself well, although the compression of the recess for the legs was excessive, and the hard elements in the lower part of the front panel posed a threat to the knees, legs and hips of the driver. The car complies with the requirements of 1998 for safety during a lateral blow. The tested sample was equipped with a pillow for the driver, which provided proper protection. Later, the options - side pillows of safety pillows were added to the list of basic configuration.

Frontal blow:

The front stand shifted back only 58 mm. The passenger salon was not deformed significantly, although the driver's door was clamped, and it was not possible to open it without tools. However, the passenger door opened normally. From the blow, the steering wheel shifted back 80 mm and up 64 mm up. The recess for the legs was compressed, and the brake pedal shifted back 350 mm. Protection of the head and neck of the driver is recognized as good, and the head of the head on the airbag is stable. Passive safety systems were able to prevent the contact of the driver with the steering wheel. The driver’s left knee hit the steering column casing, the lever of its adjustment and the lower part of the front panel. If the blow came a little to the right, there would be a more rigid contact with the steering column adjustment lever or ignition, increasing the risk of injury. If the knee penetrated deeper into the front panel, then the risk of injury would be even higher. The right knee, in turn, hit the casing of the steering column and hit the front panel. If the blow fell a little to the side, it would fall into the mechanism of adjusting the steering column or even its lock located above. The compression of the recess for the legs was significant. As a result, the proper protection of the feet and ankles is not ensured. During the frontal impact, the passenger was well protected - the safety of the head, neck, knees, legs, feet was appreciated by a high rating. The only exception was the chest, exposed to a large load from the seat belt.

Safety of passenger children:

There is a slight incompatibility between chairs for children and seats, but not so large as to create a threat to the safety of passenger children.

Side blow:

The chest, abdominal and pelvic parts of the driver hit the door, was the risk of damage. The protection of the head is good.

Pedestrian safety:

Protection of the head of a minor pedestrian. Four out of six control points comply with regulatory requirements. Another point was close to this. The point above the shock absorber showed the result better than average. The junction of the hood and wing was worse than average. Feet protection. None of the control points comply with regulatory requirements, although one - near the hood castle - was close to this. Protection of the head of an adult. Three points showed the result better than average, three - worse. One of them is located near the left wiper. Feet protection. None of the three control points comply with regulatory requirements, worse than average.

General information about the car

The location of the steering wheel On right
Tested model Nissan Primera 1.6 GX
Type of body 5-door hatchback
Year of data publication 1997
Curb weight 1219

Safety system equipment:

Front seat belts There is
Front seat belts load limiters Not
Front Pillow of Safety of the driver There is
Passenger front pillow Not
Side airbags Not
Side pillows of head safety pillows Not
Knee -off pillow and legs of the driver Not

Photo of crash test