Crash test Nissan Micra 5 doors since 2010 hatchback

Driver and passengers. Common score 30 | 84%

Frosting (12.7 points)

Driver Passenger - Fine - Good - Satisfactorily - Badly - Very bad

Head Driver's Head Contact with Airbag stable Passenger's head contact with airbag stable Breast Passenger branch stable Displacement front rack back 18mm Shift steering wheel back no Shift steering wheel up 26mm. Chest contact with steering wheel no Top of legs, knees and hip area Contact with firm elements of the front panel Ignition Castle, steering column with position lock, central console, protective casing Knees Ignition Castle, steering column with position lock, central console, protective casing Lower leg and foot Foot recess compression no Displacement pedals back clutch pedal - 67mm Pedal shift top no

Side collision with a car (7.7 points), and with post (7.1 points)

Automobile Pillar

Head Airbag yes Breast Airbag yes

Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)

Description of the chair Basic level, fabric, 2 manual adjustments Type of head restraint passive Geometric assessment -0,2 Test - Strong kick 2,7 - Middle Stick 2,4 - Weak strike 2,6

Children's passengers. Common score 39 | 79%

Child up to 18 months
Brand chair	Fair G0 / 1 S With RearwardFacing Isofix Base		Front shock
Emergency Group	0, 0+		Head move forward	protected
Location	face back		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	ISOFIX Mounting and Support Frame		Chest load	maximum rating
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	11,8	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2

Child older than 3 years
Brand chair			Front shock
Emergency Group	1		Head move forward	protected
Location	face forward		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	ISOFIX fastening with a safety cable		Chest load	weak
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	12	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2
Assessment of car	3		Airbag Prevention Warning	Present on both sides of the driver and passenger solar visor

Pedestrians. Common score 21 | 58% System Act. Security Common Score 4 | 57%

- Fine - Good - Satisfactory

Speed \u200b\u200blimiter - 0, not available Stability Course (ESC) 3 Signaling about unatigned safety belts One: Driver Head 13,4 Hip area. 1,6 Legs 6

Protection of adult passengers:

With a frontal blow, the passenger salon Nissan Micra has retained integrity. Indicators of mannequins talk about good knee protection and hips, near the front seats of passengers. However, the rigid elements of the dashboard were a threat to injury to passengers of various sizes and located in various positions. In this regard, the protection in the areas of the knees / hips / pelvic bone was extremely low evaluation. In the side collision with the barrier, the protection of all parts of the body received a good assessment. The indicators of the mannequin in the pectoral parts were also good, but the car was fined for an unrealistic heavy load on the mannequin, and therefore the defense received only a satisfactory assessment. With more stringent conditions in the test of the side collision with the post, the indicators of the mannequin regarding the fracture of the ribs speak of an extremely low degree of breast protection. In a collision behind, the protection of the neck from the whip injury was very low evaluation.

Security of passenger children

The shift of the head of a 3-year-old man's mannequin's head in a children's seat in the direction of movement was acceptable. In the side collision, protective shells of children's seats were properly kept both mannequin of children, and 3-year-old, and one and a half year. A passenger airbag can be disabled thanks to the switch, which in turn allows the use of children's seat against the direction of movement in this place. However, the information provided by the driver regarding the state of the airbag is not clear enough. The label, which is in the car clearly warns the danger of using a children's chair against the direction of movement without preliminary decontamination of airbags.

Protection of pedestrians

The bumper received a maximum of glasses for protecting foot pedestrians. The front of the bumper showed extremely weak protection in most tested places. Protection of the hood in most places of the presumptive strike of the baby's head was good. Nevertheless, the protection in the places of the presumptive strike of the adult head was mainly weak.

Protection of pedestrians

The system of course stability (ESC) is included in the basic configuration of the model and meets the EURO NCAP test requirements. There is an invalid seat belt alarm for the driver. The speed limiter differs from previously tested devices in Visia cars.

General information about the car

Tested model	Nissan Micra 1.2 'Visia', model with left steering
Body type	hatchback (5 doors)
Year of data publishing	2010
Curb weight, kg	945 kg
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ...	MDHFBUK13U0027824

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts	There is
Front Belts Load Loaders	There is
Driver Front Airbag	There is
Passenger Front Airbag	There is
Side airbags	There is
Side Head Airbags	There is
Driver's knees airbag	No
Dynamic stabilization system	No
Reminder of non-profitable safety belts	No