Crash Test Nissan Almera (Pulsar) 3 Doors 2000 - 2002 Hatchback

Crash test Nissan Almera (Pulsar) 3 doors 2000, 2001, 2002: Laboratory car safety assessment: Rating in points, test report (photo and video crash test)
26%
Driver and passengers
16%
Pedestrians

Protection of the driver and passenger

driver Damage at Lobby
Frosting, driver
passenger Damage at Lobby
Front punch, passenger
driver damage with lateral impact
Side blow, driver
Fine - Fine
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months Roemer Peggy, face forward
Child older than 3 years Roemer King, face forward

Pedestrian safety

the result of the crash test is excellent - Fine
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is satisfactory - Satisfactorily

Comments:

Almera spoke in the test worse than her close relative Tino. The car "distinguished" the worse driver's defense, especially in the field of chest and legs. However, the overall result is no worse than others, but in comparison with the previous generation Almera noticeable great progress.

Front punch:

The body is significantly deforated, so it is difficult to predict how he behaves in a more serious collision. Airbags for both front sediments are included in the basic bundle. Although there are plates in the steering column to protect the driver, they are not enough to prevent damage at a tough collision. The front seat belts are equipped with pretensioners that reduce the risk of damage. The central seat of the seat of the seats is equipped with a three-point inertial seat belt, providing better protection compared to static waist.

Security of passenger children:

Rearmost seat belts are designed for fixing children's chairs. This is reported on three languages, fixed on the belt itself. A warning about the front passenger safety pillow on the visible side of the sunscreen visor is clear, however it can easily break away. The manufacturer recommended using the Römer King chairs for 3-year and Römer Peggy for a 18-month passenger installed "in the direction of movement". Only such chairs are compatible with seat belts. The Römer King chair was unreliable fastened by the belt, allowing the passenger's head to approach the dangerous distance to the traumatic elements in the cabin. The 18-month passenger turned out to be protected better, although the experts noted the high burden on the neck, usually occurring for the chairs established "in the direction of movement".

Side strike:

Side airbags for breasts and heads provided an appropriate level of protection at side shocks about overlapping and a pillar, although they did not completely reveal. The abdominal department of the driver suffered from contact with the armrest.

Pedestrian safety:

The front edge of the hood and the bumper provided weak pedestrian foot protection. The hood softened the blow to the places where the child's head falls.

General information about the car

Roelf location Left
Tested model Nissan Almera 1.5 Luxury
Body type 5-door hatchback
Year of publishing data 2001
Curb weight 1238
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... SJN *** N16U0141700.

Installation Systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is
Front Belts Load Loaders There is
Driver Front Airbag There is
Passenger Front Airbag There is
Side airbags There is
Side Head Airbags There is
Driver's knees and feet airbag No

Photo crash test