Crash Test Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback since 2008 Hatchback
Crash test Mitsubishi Lancer Hatchback 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Laboratory safety assessment of the car: Rating in points, test report (photo and video crash test)
Side collision with a car (7.5 points), and with a pillar (5.5 points)
Automobile
Pillar
Head Airbag
There is
Breast Airbag
There is
Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)
Description of the chair
Type of head restraint
Passive
Geometric assessment
0
Test
- Strong kick
1.7
- Middle Stick
2
- Weak strike
1.9
Children's passengers. Common score 39 | 80%
Child up to 18 months
Brand chair
Britax R.
Front shock
Emergency Group
0, 0+
Head move forward
Protected
Location
Face back
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Fastening
Isofix.
Chest load
Insignificant
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
11.4
Fixation of the head
Protected
Marking Evaluation
4
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Evaluation of fastening
2
Child older than 3 years
Brand chair
Britax R.
Front shock
Emergency Group
1
Head move forward
Protected
Location
Face forward
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Fastening
ISOFIX and support belt
Chest load
Insignificant
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
12
Fixation of the head
Protected
Marking Evaluation
4
Scald acceleration
Moderate
Evaluation of fastening
2
Assessment of car
4
Airbag Prevention Warning
Warning sticker on sunscreen visor
Pedestrians. Common score 12 | 34% System Act. Safety Common Score 5 | 71%
- Fine
- Good
- Satisfactory
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter
0 (missing)
Stability Course (ESC)
3 (in basic configuration)
Signaling about unatigned safety belts
2 (driver and passenger)
Head
7.5
Hip area
0
Legs
4.7
Protection of adult passengers:
With a frontal blow, the passenger salon is deformed not significantly. Mannequin sensors recorded the driver's heads about the steering wheel. If it were not for a penalty for this, maximum points would be accrued for protecting the driver in all zones. The knees and hips of both front passengers were well protected. The manufacturer managed to prove that the same level of security is provided by sedresses of various complexes in different positions. With lateral impact on overlapping, all regions are recognized as good. However, the driver's door was opened, for which the penalty points were accrued. With lateral impact about the post, the chest protection was weak. What is the degree of compression of the edges, the protection of the abdominal department - a little better, as well as the protection of the neck when you hit the back.
Security of passenger children
Based on the testimony of mannequin sensors, the protection of a 3-year passenger during front and lateral blows is estimated in the maximum number of points. The front passenger airbag can be disabled, which allows you to install the children's chair "against the direction of movement" in its place, however, informing the driver about the status of the pillow is not clear enough. Properly notice the availability of the installation of the chair using the ISOFIX mounting system on the rear seats.
Protection of pedestrians
The front edge of the hood earned 0 points for protecting foot pedestrians, and its surface provided weak adult head protection in most places.
Protection of pedestrians
As a result of the application of the new EURO NCAP evaluation scheme, Mitsubishi made an electronic stabilization system more affordable. Since mid-February 2009, Mitsubishi Active Stability and Traction Control (MASTC) is included in the basic configuration for most Lancer options and the option for the rest across Europe. It should be remembered that some instances in dealers warehouses may not be equipped with MASTC and Euro NCAP advice advise to choose cars with such a system. Signaling about non-impressed safety belts is included in the basic bundle.
General information about the car
Tested model
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 Invite, Handlebar Left