Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V Crash Test 1998 - 1999 Sedan

Crash test Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1998, 1999: Laboratory safety assessment of a car: ranking in points, test report (photo and video crash test)
14%
Driver and passengers
14%
Pedestrians

Protection of the driver and passenger

driver Damage at Lobby Shoot
Frosting, driver
passenger Damage at Lobby
Front Punch, Passenger
driver damage with lateral impact
Side blow, driver
Excellent - Excellent
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months No information
Child older than 3 years No information

Safety pedestrians

the result of the crash test is excellent - Excellent
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is satisfactory - Satisfactorily

Comments:

Of the two reserved stars, the second was removed due to poor breastfeeding driver with lateral impact. The car did not comply with security requirements in the EU in October 1998. Also, the car body with a frontal impact and the floor is strongly deformed. The estimate for pedestrian protection turned out to be slightly above average.

Front punch:

The driver's door has seriously suffered. The floor and leg deepening were also damaged. The airbag shot a little left of the driver, and his head hit the steering wheel. Hard elements were a danger to the hips and drivers' knees. The right foot was also at risk of damage due to the load in the area below the knee. For both front sediments, there was a risk of getting injuries of the chest due to the load from seat belts.

Security of passenger children:

The seat belts of the extreme places of the back row of seats are designed in such a way as to snap into the installed children's chairs, which informs the inscription on the belts themselves. The test used by the manufacturer of the armchair pressed forward by the face, however, is incompatible with seat belts. High location of the buckle prevented the dense fixation of the chair. Perhaps because of this, with the frontal blow, the head of the mannequins was too shifted forward. The load on the chest of the older child is recognized as high, and its head was not held with lateral impact within the chair, unlike the head of 18-month. However, the latter's head jerk was quite strong, which could lead to a serious injury.

Side strike:

Although the shift of the door was practically vertical, the strong impact was rendered almost all the drivers. His head hit the belt fastening on the central rack. The load on the abdominal and pelvic departments was relatively low, possibly due to the heavy load on the chest. The frame of the chair shifted down - near the door, and up - closer to the cabin center.

Pedestrian safety:

All besides two places, where the head of the child's head falls, consisted of the requirements, but the place of the junction of the hood and wings is unsafe. Protecting the head of an adult pedestrian almost in all places is weak. The front edge of the hood and the bumper provided the protection above the average, but far from good.

General information about the car

Roelf location Left
Tested model Mitsubishi Lancer Clx.
Body type 4-door sedan
Year of data publishing 1998
Curb weight 1244

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is
Front Belts Load Loaders No
Driver Front Airbag There is
Passenger Front Airbag No
Side airbags No
Side Head Airbags No
Driver's knees and feet airbag No

Photo crash test