Krash Test Mitsubishi I-Miev 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Laborator assessment of car safety: rating in points, report on the test (photo and video of the crash test)
Contact of the driver's head with a pillow of safety
stable
Contact of the passenger head with a pillow of safety
stable
Breast
Passenger department
unstable
Front rack displacement
65mm
Shift of the steering wheel back
43mm
Steering wheel offset
no
Breast contact with the steering wheel
no
Upper part of the legs, knees and hip area
Contact with solid elements of the front panel
Steering column with a latch; metal protection; central console (panel); The cover of the glove compartment
Point loads on knees
Steering column with a location; metal protection; The central part of the panel
Lower part of the leg and foot
Compression of the recess for the legs
gap
The displacement of pedals back
brake pedal - 103mm
The displacement of the pedals up
brake pedal - 28mm
A side collision with a car (7 points), and with a pillar (6 points)
Automobile
Pillar
Headbrush pillow
yes
Pillow for breasts
yes
Back in the back (protection of the spine) (points)
Description of the chair
fabric upholstery, manual setting in 6 positions
Type of the headrest
Return
Geometric assessment
0,9
Testing
- A strong blow
2,3
- Average blow
2,7
- A weak blow
2,3
Children-passengers. General score 38 | 78%
Child up to 18 months
Mark of the chair
ritax r
Frontal blow
Roof group
0, 0+, 1
The movement of the head forward
protected
Location
face forward
Acceleration of the head
maximum rating
Fastening
ISOFIX fastening with a safety cable
Stress on the chest
maximum rating
Side blow
Protection assessment
10
Fixation of the head
protected
Marking assessment
4
Acceleration of the head
max rating
Assessment of mounting
2
A child over 3 years old
Mark of the chair
ritax r
Frontal blow
Roof group
0, 0+, 1
The movement of the head forward
protected
Location
face forward
Acceleration of the head
maximum rating
Fastening
ISOFIX fastening with a safety cable
Stress on the chest
maximum rating
Side blow
Protection assessment
12
Fixation of the head
protected
Marking assessment
4
Acceleration of the head
max rating
Assessment of mounting
2
Assessment of the car
4
Prevention of the presence of airbag
Text warning and visual informer (picture) are qualitatively applied to both sides of the front right solar visor
Pedestrians. General score 17 | 48% system act. Security General score 6 | 86%
- Excellent
- Good
- Satisfactory
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter
not available
Excurs stability system (ESC)
3
Alarm about unknown seat belts
3 informers: driver, front passenger and rear passengers
Head
11,2
Hip area
0
Legs
6
Protection of adult passengers:
The structure of the Mitsubishi I-Miev salon was at the limit of its bearing capacity. A rather weak level of protection was demonstrated for the driver and passenger, chest, knees and feet showed the ultimate result. The test showed that a similar level of protection will be provided for passengers of different sizes and for those who were sitting in different poses. A side blow to the machine showed good results. A blow to the side with a pillar was catastrophically wrinkled by a mannequin. The seat and the headrest provide good protection against woven neck injuries in case of impact from behind.
Safety of passenger children
The car scored a maximum of points for the protection of a 3-year-old child. During the frontal and lateral strike of the mannequins of children, it was not a big opportunity for a child to hit the salon.
Pedestrian protection
Bamoper sensors recorded maximum indicators. The front edge of the hood was very traumatic. Sensors on the hood showed average results. Possible places of the child’s head were dangerous, unlike the head of an adult pedestrian.
Pedestrian protection
The target stability system (ESC), as well as alarm about the non -set seat belts of the front and rear riders are included in the basic package of all modifications of the model.