Crash Test Mercedes Benz E 55 AMG T-Modell S211 2004-2006 station wagon

Krash Test Mercedes Benz E-class T-Modell AMG 2004, 2005, 2006: Laborator assessment of car safety: rating in points, report on the test (photo and video of the crash test)
33%
Driver and passengers
4%
Pedestrians

Protection of the driver and passenger

damage to the driver during a frontal impact
Frontal blow, driver
damage to the passenger during the frontal impact
Loba blow, passenger
damage to the driver during a lateral strike
Side blow, driver
Excellent - Excellent
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months Britax Roemer Duo, facing forward
A child over 3 years old Britax Roemer Duo, facing forward

Safety of pedestrians

the result of the crash test is excellent - Excellent
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is less - Satisfactorily

Comments:

The body turned out to be extremely durable and well protected passengers. However, the load on the chest cells of the front riders turned out to be high, even despite the presence of two -stage restrictions on the load load. For the front riders, an alarm was also offered to the unsteady seat belts. The protection of the children was good, and their seats met almost all the requirements of Euro NCAP. However, pedestrians were in danger.

Frontal blow:

The front airbag is revealed in two stages, increasing protection in serious clashes. The impact of the passenger pillow is regulated by the mass sensor installed in the pillow of the chair. These systems, as well as a strong body and the lack of displacement of the steering column, provided the driver with a safe space. The designers of the car were applied a lot of efforts to ensure the protection of the knees and hips of the front riders. Unfortunately, the contacts of the left knee of the driver with the front panel and both knees of the passenger with a glove box are still a danger of injury. The niche for the legs was deformed slightly. Finally, the central place of the rear seat is equipped with a three -point seat belt that provides much better protection compared to waist.

Safety of passenger children:

The inscription in German and English warned about the danger of obtaining severe or even a fatal injury by a child located in the children's chair “Against the direction of movement” opposite the active airbag. However, the corresponding sticker was poorly fixed. Both chairs were fixed “facing forward” using seat belts. The two -point ISOFIX mounts were offered as additional equipment, so there were no them on the test copy. The chairs worked well, only the load recorded on the chest of the older child did not allow the highest rating. A special system turns off the airbaging pillow of the front passenger when installing a child seat in its place.

Side blow:

The safety system included side pillows and safety curtains for passengers of both rows. Impressive! However, during the first side hit on the column, the finish of the central rack prevented the normal opening of the safety curtain. The fasteners were modernized and, when repeated, worked as it should.

Pedestrian safety:

The front of the car is very stiff, only some control points of the hood surface softened the blow. What does a bad result say.

General information about the car

The location of the steering wheel Left
Tested model Mercedes-Benz E-Class 220cdi Elegance
Type of body 4-door sedan
Year of data publication 2002
Curb weight 1650
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... WDB211XXXA183000

Safety system equipment:

Front seat belts There is
Front seat belts load limiters There is
Front Pillow of Safety of the driver There is
Passenger front pillow There is
Side airbags There is
Side pillows of head safety pillows There is
Knee -off pillow and legs of the driver Not

Photo of crash test