Crash Test Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Universal 2002 - 2005 Universal

Crash Test Mazda Mazda 6 (Atenza) Universal 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005: Laboratory Car Safety Assessment: Rankings in points, test report (photo and video crash test)
26%
Driver and passengers
7%
Pedestrians
34%
Children-passengers

Protection of the driver and passenger

driver Damage at Lobby
Frosting, driver
passenger Damage at Lobby
Front punch, passenger
driver damage with lateral impact
Side blow, driver
Fine - Fine
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months Britax Roemer Duo Plus, face forward
Child older than 3 years Britax Roemer Duo Plus, face forward

Pedestrian safety

the result of the crash test is excellent - Fine
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is satisfactory - Satisfactorily

Comments:

Mazda 6 body is just a bit deforming in the area of \u200b\u200bthe left front counter. However, points were removed for crushing the driver's foot niches. In addition, high loads with headlight and lateral blows were affected by its chest, improving the risk of injury to this area. In the rest of the relationship, the protection of the front sediments was sufficient. The protection of children is ambiguous, and pedestrians are average for cars of this class and size.

Front punch:

The passive security system included two-tier pillows, belts with pretensioners and load limiters. It kept the head and chest of the driver from the strike of the steering wheel, however, caused a greater load on his chest. The rigid elements of the front panel under the steer column are a threat to his knees and hips. The central seat of the seat is equipped with a three-point seat belt, providing much better protection compared to the waist.

Security of passenger children:

The test used by the manufacturer of Britax Romer Duo Plus "face forward" recommended by the manufacturer. They provided good defense, although the elder child risked to get injuries of the head at a side strike. The warning about the inadmissibility of the installation of the children's chair "against the direction of movement" at the site of the front passenger was well thought out and was placed on both sides of the sunscreen visor.

Side strike:

System of protection with side shocks included side airbags in the backs of seats and curtains. As a result, the car showed itself well with lateral blows about overlapping and pole. However, the maximum assessment was not delivered due to the uncharacteristic for the actual conditions for the distribution of the load between the mannequin and the chair, which led to a decrease in the sensor readings in the chest of the mannequin.

Pedestrian safety:

A small zone where the head of a child's pedestrian falls at the race, ensured the softening of the strike, but such places of the possible strike of the adult head, as well as the wings turned out to be very hurried. The bumper and the front edge of the hood also soften the blow slightly.

General information about the car

Roelf location Left
Tested model Mazda 6 2.3 Sport
Body type 5-door hatchback
Year of publishing data 2003
Curb weight 1510
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... Jmzgg12f241179856, jmzgg14t241179696, jmzgy19t241132420

Installation Systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is
Front Belts Load Loaders There is
Driver Front Airbag There is
Passenger Front Airbag There is
Side airbags There is
Side Head Airbags There is
Driver's knees and feet airbag No

Photo crash test