Kia Venga Crash Test since 2009 hatchback

Driver and passengers. Common score 28 | 79%

Frontal impact (9.7 points)

Driver Passenger - Fine - Good - Satisfactorily - Badly - Very bad

Head Driver's Head Contact with Airbag stable Passenger's head contact with airbag stable Breast Passenger branch stable Displacement front rack back 18mm. Shift steering wheel back no Shift steering wheel up no Chest contact with steering wheel yes Top of legs, knees and hip area Contact with firm elements of the front panel yes: Ignition Castle; steering column and position lock; part of the FLANGE panel; GloveBox LID. Knees yes: Panel supported by plastic flange, glove cover Lower leg and foot Foot recess compression no Displacement pedals back clutch pedal - 77mm Pedal shift top clutch pedal - 30mm

Side collision with car (8 points), and with post (7.2 points)

Automobile Pillar

Head Airbag yes Breast Airbag yes

Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)

Description of the chair Standard, Fabric, 2 Manual Settings Type of head restraint Return Geometric assessment 1 Test - Strong kick 2,5 - Middle Stick 2,6 - Weak strike 2,3

Children's passengers. Common score 32 | 66%

Child up to 18 months
Brand chair	FAIR G0 / 1 S ISOFIX		Front shock
Emergency Group	0, 0+		Head move forward	protected
Location	face back		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	ISOFIX Mounting and Support Frame		Chest load	weak
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	6,6	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2

Child older than 3 years
Brand chair	FAIR G0 / 1 S ISOFIX		Front shock
Emergency Group	1		Head move forward	vulnerable
Location	face forward		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	ISOFIX Mounting and Support Frame		Chest load	weak
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	5,7	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2
Assessment of car	8		Airbag Prevention Warning	Text and pictogram on both side of the visor.

Pedestrians. Common score 23 | 64% System Act. Safety Common Score 5 | 71%

- Fine - Good - Satisfactory

Speed \u200b\u200blimiter Active: optional Stability Course (ESC) 3 Signaling about unatigned safety belts Two: Driver and Front Passenger Head 12,8 Hip area 4,2 Legs 6

Protection of adult passengers:

With a frontal blow, the passenger salon Kia Venga has retained integrity. Compared to an assessment of the initial test, the driver's chest protection has improved and the "very weak defense" assessment is still an improvement in comparison with a low indicator of that time. Mannequin indicators talk about good knee protection and hips at the driver and passenger located on the front seats. Nevertheless, the steering column and the ignition candle represented the risk of injury in the hips of the driver. The changes made did not touch the work of the car in the side collision, and the results remained unchanged compared with the initial assessment. In the side collision with the Venga barrier earned the maximum number of points. In more stringent conditions, the testing of the side collision with the mannequin pillar indicated that the protection of the chest was extremely weak, and the protection of other parts of the body on the contrary is good. Protection against a whip injury when a collision has become convincingly good.

Security of passenger children

With the first assessment of a mannequin of a 3-year-old child during the return, collided with the rear pillar. This time there was no such collision: the displacement of a 3-year-old man's mannequin, located in the children's seat in the direction of movement, was moderate, and the return was controlled. In the side collision, both dumplings were properly designed, each in his chair, respectively. The passenger airbag on the front seat can be disabled, in order to use there children's seats against the direction of movement. The driver receives direct information relating to the airbag state, for which the system has been rewarded Euro NCAP. The immentable label clearly warns the danger of using chairs against the direction of movement on the front passenger seat without prior deactivation of airbag.

Protection of pedestrians

The bumper earned the maximum number of points for the protection of pedestrian feet. The front of the hood showed extremely weak protection. In most places where the child can hit his head, the hood demonstrated good protection, but in places where an adult can hit his head, the defense was mostly weak.

Protection of pedestrians

The system of course sustainability is available optionally in Kia Venga in four European countries, in all other it is included in the standard package. Due to the fact that it should become standard in more cars sold, Euro NCAP counted this characteristic when evaluating the car. Speed \u200b\u200blimiter is available as an option, which is not enough to obtain an assessment, as it is not included in the standard package in any of the modifications. The model is equipped with unwanted safety belts for driver and front passenger.

General information about the car

Tested model	KIA VENGA 1.4 GLS, model with left handle
Body type	minivan (5 doors)
Year of data publishing	2010
Curb weight, kg	1220 kg
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ...	applicable to all VENGA models

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts	There is
Front Belts Load Loaders	There is
Driver Front Airbag	Single-stage
Passenger Front Airbag	Single-stage
Side airbags	Optional, complies with European security requirements 2010
Side Head Airbags	Optional, complies with European security requirements 2010
Driver's knees airbag	No
Dynamic stabilization system	No
Reminder of non-profitable safety belts	No