Crash test Hyundai H1 (I800) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Labotor assessment of the safety of the car: Rating in points, test report (photo and video crash test)
steering column; bottom of the central panel; glove box
Knees
steering column; bottom of the central panel; glove box
Lower leg and foot
Foot recess compression
no
Displacement pedals back
brake pedal - 142mm
Pedal shift top
brake pedal - 67mm
Side collision with a car (7.8 points), and with post (points)
Automobile
Pillar
Head Airbag
no
Breast Airbag
no
Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)
Description of the chair
Type of head restraint
Geometric assessment
0
Test
- Strong kick
0
- Middle Stick
0
- Weak strike
0
Children's passengers. Common score 37 | 75%
Child up to 18 months
Brand chair
ritax-R.
Front shock
Emergency Group
0, 0+
Head move forward
protected
Location
face back
Scald acceleration
maximum rating
Fastening
ISOFIX Mounting and Support Frame
Chest load
weak
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
8,6
Fixation of the head
protected
Marking Evaluation
4
Scald acceleration
max Evaluation
Evaluation of fastening
2
Child older than 3 years
Brand chair
ritax-R.
Front shock
Emergency Group
1
Head move forward
protected
Location
face forward
Scald acceleration
maximum rating
Fastening
ISOFIX fastening with a safety cable
Chest load
maximum rating
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
12
Fixation of the head
protected
Marking Evaluation
4
Scald acceleration
max Evaluation
Evaluation of fastening
2
Assessment of car
4
Airbag Prevention Warning
Texto-graphic warning applied to the sunny trump
Pedestrians. Common score 10 | 34% System Act. Security Common Score 3 | 43%
- Fine
- Good
- Satisfactory
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter
The presence is not estimated
Stability Course (ESC)
3
Signaling about unatigned safety belts
0
Head
4,2
Hip area
0
Legs
6
Protection of adult passengers:
With a frontal blow, the Passenger Salon Hyundai H-1 has retained integrity. Mannequin sensors showed good protection in the field of knees and the hips of the driver and passenger. However, parts of the dashboard were traumatic for passengers of different growth and the position in which they were. In the lateral collision, the protection of the chest was satisfactory, while other parts of the body are sore. There was no collision with the pillar, since the H-1 is not equipped with a side pillow seat. The geometric estimate of the front and rear places showed poor protection of damage with the belt in the case of the back collision.
Security of passenger children
Based on the testimony of the sensors of the mannequin, in the dynamic crash tests H-1 earned the maximum scores to protect a 3-year-old child. With any test, the mannequin was not excessive. When testing a side strike, both dummy were securely fixed, which minimized the likelihood of contact with the parts of the car's cabin. The front passenger seat cushion does not have a shutdown function, so the transport of a child in the front seat face back is contraindicated. Information about this is contained in the car.
Protection of pedestrians
Bumper scored the maximum number of points for protecting foot pedestrians. However, the protection of the child's head and the adult pedestrian was scarce. Evaluation of the front edge of the hood was not appropriate due to the form and size of the car.
Protection of pedestrians
The system of course stability (ESC) is included in the basic configuration of the model. However, there are no signaling devices of non-abutable safety belts even for a driver's seat, there are no speed limiters.
General information about the car
Tested model
Hyundai H-1 2.5 Diesel GLS, model with left handle