Hyundai Getz 3 doors 2002 - 2005 hatchback

Hyundai Getz 3 doors 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005: Laborator assessment of car safety: rating in points, report on the conducted test (photo and video of the crash test)
25%
Driver and passengers
5%
Pedestrians
37%
Children-passengers

Protection of the driver and passenger

damage to the driver during a frontal impact
Frontal blow, driver
damage to the passenger during the frontal impact
Loba blow, passenger
damage to the driver during a lateral strike
Side blow, driver
Excellent - Excellent
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months Britax Roemer Baby-Safe Plus, face back
A child over 3 years old Britax Roemer Duo Plus, facing forward

Safety of pedestrians

the result of the crash test is excellent - Excellent
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is less - Satisfactorily

Comments:

Getz turned out to be a very balanced car and earned his four stars. Safety systems were included by single -stage frontal airbags, side pillows and safety curtains, pretense and restraints of the load of the front belts. The driver also offered an alarm about an unstobed \u200b\u200bseat belt. The protection of children, in general, turned out to be good, but no such preferences were provided to pedestrians.

Frontal blow:

The design of the body was recognized as reliable. However, the back of the leg niche was very deformed. The loads recorded by sensors in mannequins were quite large. The driver’s left leg was also undergoing high load. Due to the contact of the knees of the driver and the front passenger with hard elements around the steering column and under the surface of the front panel, the legs are subjected to a significant risk of injury.

Safety of passenger children:

The durable sticker in the sunglance of the passenger, visible in a folded state, reported about the danger of placing a children's chair “against the direction of movement” at the site of the front passenger with an active pillow of safety. The protection of young passengers was at a high level. The eldest child was located in the Britax Romer Duo Plus armchair, fixed by “face forward” in ISOFIX locks and upper mounts. The 18-month-old was put in the Britax Romer Babysafe chair, fixed “against the direction of movement” using a seat belt. With the front of the Ular, the load on the neck of the youngest child was high.

Side blow:

The impressive side protection system included two -chamber side pillows in the backs of the seats. The load on the driver’s chest was slightly high, but the penalty points were also accrued for the distribution of the load between the back of the mannequin and the chair that reduced the readings of the sensors uncharacteristic for real conditions.

Pedestrian safety:

At least some protection was provided by the points where the head of an adult pedestrian would fall during the arrival. All other places were dangerous. Bad result.

General information about the car

The location of the steering wheel Left
Tested model Hyundai Getz 1.3
Type of body 5-door hatchback
Year of data publication 2004
Curb weight 1072
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... KMHBT51HP5U319180

Safety system equipment:

Front seat belts There is
Front seat belts load limiters There is
Front Pillow of Safety of the driver There is
Passenger front pillow There is
Side airbags There is
Side pillows of head safety pillows There is
Knee -off pillow and legs of the driver Not

Photo of crash test