Ford Transit Connect Crash Test since 2010 Van

Driver and passengers. Common score 30 | 84%

Frontal impact (12.8 points)

Driver Passenger - Fine - Good - Satisfactorily - Badly - Very bad

Head Driver's Head Contact with Airbag stable Passenger's head contact with airbag stable Breast Passenger branch stable Displacement front rack back 9mm. Shift steering wheel back no Shift steering wheel up 36mm. Chest contact with steering wheel no Top of legs, knees and hip area Contact with firm elements of the front panel steering column; bottom of the central panel; glove box Knees steering column; bottom of the central panel; glove box Lower leg and foot Foot recess compression no Displacement pedals back clutch pedal - 48mm Pedal shift top clutch pedal - 64mm

Side collision with car (8 points), and with post (7.1 points)

Automobile Pillar

Head Airbag yes Breast Airbag yes

Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)

Description of the chair Type of head restraint Geometric assessment 0 Test - Strong kick 0 - Middle Stick 0 - Weak strike 0

Children's passengers. Common score 44 | 90%

Child up to 18 months
Brand chair	BRITAX BABY SAFE PLUS ISOFIX		Front shock
Emergency Group	0, 0+		Head move forward	protected
Location	face back		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	ISOFIX fastening with a safety cable		Chest load	maximum rating
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	12	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2

Child older than 3 years
Brand chair	Britax Duo Plus Isofix		Front shock
Emergency Group	1		Head move forward	protected
Location	face forward		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	ISOFIX fastening with a safety cable		Chest load	maximum rating
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	12	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2
Assessment of car	8		Airbag Prevention Warning	Text and graphic pictogram are applied on both visors

Pedestrians. Common score 14 | 48% System Act. Safety Common Score 5 | 71%

- Fine - Good - Satisfactory

Speed \u200b\u200blimiter Active: optional Stability Course (ESC) 3 Signaling about unatigned safety belts One: Driver Head 12 Hip area. 0 Legs 2,3

Protection of adult passengers:

With a frontal blow, the Ford Transit Custom passenger salon retained integrity. Sensors on mannequins indicated good knee protection and driver and passenger hips. But the elements of the dashboard are the risk of injury during the collision, depending on the position and growth of the passenger. In the side impact test, TRANSIT CUSTOM earned maximum points for good protection of all areas of the body. With lateral impact on the post, the protection of the chest and belly area was sufficient, at that time the protection of the head and the pelvis was noted as good. Whitelash Protection was estimated based on the analysis of the front and rear seats and head restraints. The assessment showed a poor protection against injury to the safety belt in the case of a posterior collision.

Security of passenger children

Based on the testimony of mannequin sensors during frontal and lateral blows, Transit Custom scored the maximum number of points for the protection of children's 18 month and 3 years of age. With a frontal blow, the displacement of the mannequin (3 years) was not excessive. When testing the side impact, the mannequins were well fixed in the chairs, which reduced the likelihood of contacting heads with parts of the car. The airbag on the passenger side has a shutdown function, which ensures safe transportation of children in the chair in the front seat face back. Information about the status of the pillow is complete, for which the system has been rewarded. The danger of transportation without prior shutdown airbag is clearly designated in the car.

Protection of pedestrians

The bumper did not provide one pedestrian foot protection. The level of protection of the area of \u200b\u200bthe possible damage of the child's head was also low. Evaluation of the front edge of the hood was not appropriate due to the form and height of the vehicle.

Protection of pedestrians

The system of course stability (ESC), as well as an alarm of non-unspeted safety belts of the front sediments, is included in the basic configuration of all modifications of the model. The speed limit device is standard equipment in more than half of the cars sold and meets the requirements of Euro NCAP.

General information about the car

Tested model	Ford Transit Custom, 2.2 Diesel 'Trend' Kombi, model with left handle
Body type	Body base: Van
Year of data publishing	2012
Curb weight, kg	2091 kg
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ...	applicable to all models Transit and Tourneo Custom

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts	according to the established requirements
Front Belts Load Loaders	according to the established requirements
Driver Front Airbag	There is
Passenger Front Airbag	Meets established requirements
Side airbags	Yes, meets established standards
Side Head Airbags	yes: meets the requirements
Driver's knees airbag	No
Dynamic stabilization system	There is
Reminder of non-profitable safety belts	Only at the driver