Crash test Ford Ranger Super Cab since 2008 Pickup

Crash test Ford Ranger Super Cab 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Labotor assessment of the safety of the car: ranking on points, test report (photo and video crash test)
19%
Driver and passengers
11%
Pedestrians
28%
Passenger children

Protection of the driver and passenger

driver Damage at Lobby Shoot
Frosting, driver
passenger Damage at Lobby
Front Punch, Passenger
driver damage with lateral impact
Side blow, driver
Fine - Fine
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months Britax Babysafe, face back
Child older than 3 years Roemer Duo, face forward

Safety pedestrians

the result of the crash test is excellent - Fine
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is satisfactory - Satisfactorily

Front punch:

Ranger did not scored enough points for three stars in this category, although the total number of points was large. As a result, the passenger salon is significantly deformed. Penalty points were accrued for it, as well as for deformation of the front racks and an excessive displacement of the steering wheel. There is a danger to the driver's feet due to the offset of the brake pedal, which burst the niches for the legs and the shift back of the entire pedal node exceeded 400 mm. In safety pillows, the pressure was insufficient to prevent the driver's head contact with the steering wheel. Protecting the chest driver was recognized as weak, mainly due to the scale of deformations. The sensor in the left knee of the driver registered a high probability of injury, so the protection of this zone is recognized as weak. The deformation of the leg niches and the offset of the pedal node led to poor protection of the feet and the ankle of the driver. Ford did not test the levicultural version at a speed of 64 km / h, so Euro NCAP could not confirm that the level of protection of both versions is the same.

Security of passenger children:

Although the head of a 3-year-old passenger was not excessive jerk forward with a frontal impact, she still hit the back side of the driver's seat. This was mainly due to the shift of the driver's seat back due to the destruction of its foundation. Ranger was not equipped with ISOFIX fasteners. A reminder of the inadmissibility of the installation to the place of the front passenger of the children's chair "against the direction of movement" with the active airbag was incomprehensible and short-lived.

Side strike:

Ranger earned the maximum number of points for the side blow. The car did not equip the side airbags, so imitation of the strike of the pillar was not carried out

Pedestrian safety:

The front edge of the hood scored 0 points for protecting foot pedestrians. The surface of the hood is recognized as insecure pedestrians.

General information about the car

Roelf location On right
Tested model Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCI DOUBLE CAB
Body type 4-door pickup
Year of data publishing 2008
Curb weight 1845
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... For European Ranger, model 2006

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is
Front Belts Load Loaders There is
Driver Front Airbag There is
Passenger Front Airbag There is
Side airbags No
Side Head Airbags No
Driver's knees and feet airbag No

Photo crash test

Video crash test