Crash Test Ford Ranger 2 Doors since 2010 Pickup

Driver and passengers. Common score 34 | 96%

Frontal impact (15.7 points)

Driver Passenger - Fine - Good - Satisfactorily - Badly - Very bad

Head Driver's Head Contact with Airbag stable Passenger's head contact with airbag stable Breast Passenger branch stable Displacement front rack back 2mm Shift steering wheel back no Shift steering wheel up no Chest contact with steering wheel no Top of legs, knees and hip area Contact with firm elements of the front panel no Knees no Lower leg and foot Foot recess compression no Displacement pedals back gas pedal - 58mm Pedal shift top gas pedal - 7mm

Side collision with car (8 points), and with post (7.7 points)

Automobile Pillar

Head Airbag yes Breast Airbag yes

Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)

Description of the chair Standard, 4 manual adjustments Type of head restraint passive Geometric assessment 0,9 Test - Strong kick 2,1 - Middle Stick 1,8 - Weak strike 2,3

Children's passengers. Common score 42 | 86%

Child up to 18 months
Brand chair	Britax Romer Babysafe Plus		Front shock
Emergency Group	0		Head move forward	protected
Location	face back		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	ISOFIX Mounting and Support Frame		Chest load	weak
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	10,6	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2

Child older than 3 years
Brand chair	Britax Roemer Safefix.		Front shock
Emergency Group	1		Head move forward	protected
Location	face forward		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	ISOFIX Mounting and Support Frame		Chest load	weak
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	11,3	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2
Assessment of car	8		Airbag Prevention Warning	Warning pictogram and text on both sides of the Right Visor

Pedestrians. Common score 29 | 81% System Act. Safety Common Score 5 | 71%

- Fine - Good - Satisfactory

Speed \u200b\u200blimiter The presence is not estimated Stability Course (ESC) 3 Signaling about unatigned safety belts Two: Driver and Front Passenger Head 19 Hip area 4 Legs 6

Protection of adult passengers:

In front of the front impact, the Ford Ranger passenger salon retained integrity. Driver and passenger mannequins after the test were not damaged. The same protection will be provided for passengers of different sizes and for those who were sitting in different poses. The side punch machine showed the maximum result for all parts of the body. Side punch pillar showed good results. The seat and headrest provide the average protection against the neck injuries in the event of a blow from behind.

Security of passenger children

In front of the front impact, the mannequins were reliably held in the chairs, the child's blow to the salon was minimal. Installation information was very clear.

Protection of pedestrians

Good results showed Ford Ranger in this test. So, the bumper scored the maximum number of points. The edge of the hood lost 2 points centered. And the hood lost not many points from above on the sides. Total 29 points, 81%.

Protection of pedestrians

The system of course stability is standard and meets the requirements of Euro NCAP. Also, the car is equipped with an indicators of uneasy safety belts for the front seats. No speed limiter.

General information about the car

Tested model	Ford Ranger, 2.2 Diesel Double CAB, Model with Right Rule
Body type	normal sedan (4 doors)
Year of data publishing	2012
Curb weight, kg	2091 kg
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ...	applicable to all models Ranger

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts	There is
Front Belts Load Loaders	There is
Driver Front Airbag	There is
Passenger Front Airbag	There is
Side airbags	There is
Side Head Airbags	There is
Driver's knees airbag	There is
Dynamic stabilization system	There is
Reminder of non-profitable safety belts	Front passenger seats and driver