Fiat Panda 4x4 crash test since 2003 Hatchback

Fiat Panda 4x4 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2012, 2013, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2009, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013: Labotor assessment of the car: Ranking in points, test report (photo and video crash test)
20%
Driver and passengers
6%
Pedestrians
21%
Children-passengers

Protection of the driver and passenger

driver Damage at Lobby
Frosting, driver
passenger Damage at Lobby
Front punch, passenger
driver damage with lateral impact
Side blow, driver
Fine - Fine
Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad

Children's holding devices

Child up to 18 months Kiddy Life, face forward
Child older than 3 years Kiddy Life, face forward

Pedestrian safety

the result of the crash test is excellent - Fine
the result of the crash test is good - Good
the result of the crash test is satisfactory - Satisfactorily

Comments:

Panda's body turned out to be durable and resistant to damage. However, although the car is equipped with pretensioners and the load limiters of the front seat belts, larger forces apply to the front passenger's front passenger. Also, high load is recorded by the sensors in the driver's chest with lateral impact. With lateral impact, the damaged door fell off on his own. The safety of children disappointed as pedestrians.

Front punch:

Passive security systems include a single-stage airbag for the driver and belts with pretensioners and load limiters. Niche for the legs was deformed minimally, but the clutch pedal moved back too far, which was negatively affected by the safety of the driver's feet. Solid elements under the steering column and torpedo can also damage the tops of the driver's heads.

Security of passenger children:

The tested car was not equipped with an front airbag for the passenger, so there was no warning about the danger of placement in his place of the children's chair "against the direction of movement". For both "children", Kiddy Life chairs located "face forward" were used and secured safety belts. Although the loads registered by mannequin sensors were acceptable, the "senior" mannequin was at risk of injury during front and side shocks.

Side strike:

The results of the crash test with lateral impact were not very good. High load fell on the chest driver. Penalty points were also charged for the uncharacteristic load distribution of the driver for real conditions, which reduced the forces acting on sensors in the chest. When hit, one of the doors opened.

Pedestrian safety:

Protection provides only zones where the head of an adult is to strike. Children's pedestrian headhock impact zones: the front side of the hood and bumper - were especially equipped. The result is "bad."

General information about the car

Roelf location Left
Tested model Kiddy Life.
Body type 5-door minivan
Year of publishing data 2004
Curb weight 850
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... Zfa169000 * 00308050.

Installation Systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is
Front Belts Load Loaders There is
Driver Front Airbag There is
Passenger Front Airbag Not
Side airbags Not
Side Head Airbags Not
Driver's knees and feet airbag Not

Photo crash test