Side collision with car (8 points), and with post (7.2 points)
Automobile
Pillar
Head Airbag
yes
Breast airbag
yes
Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)
Description of the chair
Standard, Fabric, 4 Manual Settings
Type of headrest
passive
Geometric assessment
1
Test
- Strong kick
2,4
- Middle Stick
2,7
- Weak strike
2,5
Children's passengers. Common score 39 | 79%
Child up to 18 months
Brand chair
Britax Roemer Babysafe
Front end
Emergency Group
0/1
Head movement forward
protected
Location
face back
Acceleration of the head
maximum rating
Fastening
adult seat belts
Chest load
maximum rating
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
12
Fixation of the head
protected
Marking estimate
4
Acceleration of the head
max Evaluation
Evaluation of fastening
2
Child older than 3 years
Brand chair
BRITAX ROEMER DUO PLUS
Front end
Emergency Group
0/1
Head movement forward
protected
Location
face forward
Acceleration of the head
maximum rating
Fastening
ISOFIX fastening with a safety cable
Chest load
weak
Side strike
Evaluation of protection
10,5
Fixation of the head
protected
Marking estimate
4
Acceleration of the head
max Evaluation
Evaluation of fastening
2
Assessment of car
4
Airbag Prevention Warning
Text warning and pictogram are applied to a sunny visor
Pedestrians. Common score 18 | 49% System Act. security overall score 5 | 71%
- Fine
- Good
- Satisfactory
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter
The presence is not estimated
Stability Course (ESC)
3
Signaling of unatigned safety belts
Two: Driver and Front Passenger
Head
13,1
Hip area
0
Legs
4,5
Protection of adult passengers:
Chevrolet ORLANDO salon was not deformed with frontal impact. Good results for the driver and maximum for the passenger were shown. Chevrolet has shown that a similar level of protection will be provided for passengers of different sizes and for those who sat in different poses. The side impact of the machine showed good results for all parts of the body. With lateral strike, the middle protection post led the chest, the remaining parts of the body were in reliable protection. The seat and head restraint provide very good protection against the neck injuries in the event of a blow from behind.
Security of passenger children
Orlando scored the maximum number of points for the safety of an 18-month-old child. With frontal and lateral shocks, the seats of children moved slightly, there was a minimum risk of hitting the car. Head movement control was good anyway. Also Chevrolet Orlando received 4 points in the assessment of Vehicle Based Assessment.
Protection of pedestrians
Bumper provides middle pedestrian foot protection. The front edge of the hood scored 0.1 score of 6 possible, the remaining parts of the hood showed mixed results. Possible scope of the child's head showed basically good results. For the strike of an adult pedestrian, the indicators were less friendly.
Protection of pedestrians
The system of course stability (ESC) is included in the basic configuration of the model and meets the test requirements of EURO NCAP. There is alarm on non-dishepted safety belts for the driver and front passenger, but for the rear - are missing. No speed limiters in this model.
General information about the car
Tested model
Chevrolet ORLANDO 1.8 Litre Petrol, model with left handle