Driver and passengers. Common score 33 | 81%
Frosting (11.0 points)
Driver |
Passenger |
| - | Excellent |
| - | Good |
| - | Satisfactorily |
| - | Badly |
| - | Very bad |
|
|
Head |
Driver's Head Contact with Airbag | |
Passenger's head contact with airbag | |
Breast |
Passenger branch | |
Displacement front rack back | |
Shift steering wheel back | |
Shift steering wheel up | |
Chest contact with steering wheel | |
Top of legs, knees and hip area |
Contact with firm elements of the front panel | |
Knees | |
Lower leg and foot |
Foot recess compression | |
Displacement pedals back | |
Pedal shift top | |
|
Side collision with car (8 points), and with post (8.0 points)
Automobile |
Pillar |
|
Head Airbag | |
Breast Airbag | |
|
Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)
|
Description of the chair | |
Type of head restraint | |
Geometric assessment | |
Test |
- Strong kick | |
- Middle Stick | |
- Weak strike | |
|
Children's passengers. Common score 41 | 78%
Child up to 18 months |
Brand chair | Britax Romer Duo Plus | Front shock |
Emergency Group | 0, 0+ | Head move forward | |
Location | Face forward | Scald acceleration | |
Fastening | ISOFIX and safety strap | Chest load | |
Side strike |
| Evaluation of protection | 10 | Fixation of the head | |
Marking Evaluation | 4 | Scald acceleration | |
Evaluation of fastening | 2 | |
Child older than 3 years |
Brand chair | Britax Romer Duo Plus | Front shock |
Emergency Group | 1 | Head move forward | |
Location | Face forward | Scald acceleration | |
Fastening | ISOFIX and safety strap | Chest load | |
Side strike |
| Evaluation of protection | 12 | Fixation of the head | |
Marking Evaluation | 4 | Scald acceleration | |
Evaluation of fastening | 2 | |
Assessment of car | 4 | Airbag Prevention Warning | |
Pedestrians. Common score 16 | 43% ACT system. Security Common Score 3 | 43%
- Excellent
|
- Good
|
- Satisfactory
|
|
|
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter | 0 (missing) |
Stability Course (ESC) | 0 (missing) |
Signaling about unatigned safety belts | 3 (driver and passengers in front and rear) |
Head | 9.6 |
Hip area. | 0 |
Legs | 6 |
|
Protection of adult passengers:
With a frontal impact, the passenger salon was deformed slightly. Mannequin sensors noted good protection of the head and neck, however, the gripping of the chest led to a decrease in the assessment for the protection of this area of \u200b\u200bboth front sedimons. Some hard elements of the torpedo represent the potential danger to the knees and the hips of the driver and passenger. For protection for lateral impact on the Spark overlap earned the highest assessment, however, with a tougher strike, the chest protection was recognized as weak, although all other areas are good. Weak injury protection is provided when you hit the rear.
Security of passenger children
Based on the testimony of mannequin sensors with a front and side shock, the car scored the maximum number of points for the protection of a 3-year-old passenger. The movement of the head was under control in both cases. When hitting the body from both children were securely fixed in chairs. The front passenger airbag can be turned off, which allows you to install a children's chair "against the direction of movement" in its place. However, informing the driver about the status of the pillow is not clear enough. The danger of such an installation opposite the active pillow informs a securely glued message.
Protection of pedestrians
The bumper scored the maximum number of points for protecting foot pedestrians, but the front edge of the hood provided bad protection, for which he received 0 points. Mitigating the strike in places where the head of an adult pedestrian falls at the road, turned out to be predominantly bad.
Protection of pedestrians
The basic bundle of SPARK included alarm on the non-unspeted safety belts of the driver, front and rear passengers. The stabilization system at the time of testing was not offered for any of the versions of the car, so experts recommended to include it in the list of options in 2010.
General information about the car
Tested model |
Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Base Grade, steering wheel |
Body type |
5-door hatchback |
Year of data publishing |
2009 |
Curb weight, kg |
978 |
Safety systems:
Pretensels of front seat belts |
There is |
Front Belts Load Loaders |
There is |
Driver Front Airbag |
There is (single-stage) |
Passenger Front Airbag |
There is (two-stage) |
Side airbags |
There is |
Side chest airbags |
There is |
Airbag for knees and drivers |
No |