Crash Test Chevrolet Matiz (Spark) M300 since 2009 Hatchback

Crash test Chevrolet Matiz (Spark) 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Labotor assessment of the safety of the car: Ranking on points, test report (photo and video crash test)
81%
Driver and passengers
43%
Pedestrians
78%
Passenger children
43%
Active security system

Driver and passengers. Common score 33 | 81%

Frosting (11.0 points)

 crush test
Driver
 Passenger safety
Passenger
evaluation of the crash test - Excellent
 Crash Chevrolet Matiz Test (Spark) M300 since 2009 - Good
 Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad
Head
Driver's Head Contact with Airbag
Passenger's head contact with airbag
Breast
Passenger branch
Displacement front rack back
Shift steering wheel back
Shift steering wheel up
Chest contact with steering wheel
Top of legs, knees and hip area
Contact with firm elements of the front panel
Knees
Lower leg and foot
Foot recess compression
Displacement pedals back
Pedal shift top

Side collision with car (8 points), and with post (8.0 points)

 Collision with cars
Automobile
side collision with post
Pillar
Head Airbag
Breast Airbag

Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)

chevrolet Matiz (SPARK) Spine Protection (Spark) M300 since 2009
Description of the chair
Type of head restraint
Geometric assessment
Test
- Strong kick
- Middle Stick
- Weak strike

Children's passengers. Common score 41 | 78%

Child up to 18 months
Brand chairBritax Romer Duo PlusFront shock
Emergency Group0, 0+Head move forward
LocationFace forwardScald acceleration
FasteningISOFIX and safety strapChest load
Side strike
 CHEVROLET MATIZ protection assessment (SPARK) M300 since 2009Evaluation of protection10Fixation of the head
Marking Evaluation4Scald acceleration
Evaluation of fastening2
Child older than 3 years
Brand chairBritax Romer Duo PlusFront shock
Emergency Group1Head move forward
LocationFace forwardScald acceleration
FasteningISOFIX and safety strapChest load
Side strike
 Evaluation of protection12Fixation of the head
Marking Evaluation4Scald acceleration
Evaluation of fastening2
Assessment of car4Airbag Prevention Warning

Pedestrians. Common score 16 | 43% ACT system. Security Common Score 3 | 43%

safety pedestrians
Chevrolet Matiz (Spark) M300 since 2009 - Excellent
 Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactory
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter0 (missing)
Stability Course (ESC)0 (missing)
Signaling about unatigned safety belts3 (driver and passengers in front and rear)
Head9.6
Hip area.0
Legs6

Protection of adult passengers:

With a frontal impact, the passenger salon was deformed slightly. Mannequin sensors noted good protection of the head and neck, however, the gripping of the chest led to a decrease in the assessment for the protection of this area of \u200b\u200bboth front sedimons. Some hard elements of the torpedo represent the potential danger to the knees and the hips of the driver and passenger. For protection for lateral impact on the Spark overlap earned the highest assessment, however, with a tougher strike, the chest protection was recognized as weak, although all other areas are good. Weak injury protection is provided when you hit the rear.

Security of passenger children

Based on the testimony of mannequin sensors with a front and side shock, the car scored the maximum number of points for the protection of a 3-year-old passenger. The movement of the head was under control in both cases. When hitting the body from both children were securely fixed in chairs. The front passenger airbag can be turned off, which allows you to install a children's chair "against the direction of movement" in its place. However, informing the driver about the status of the pillow is not clear enough. The danger of such an installation opposite the active pillow informs a securely glued message.

Protection of pedestrians

The bumper scored the maximum number of points for protecting foot pedestrians, but the front edge of the hood provided bad protection, for which he received 0 points. Mitigating the strike in places where the head of an adult pedestrian falls at the road, turned out to be predominantly bad.

Protection of pedestrians

The basic bundle of SPARK included alarm on the non-unspeted safety belts of the driver, front and rear passengers. The stabilization system at the time of testing was not offered for any of the versions of the car, so experts recommended to include it in the list of options in 2010.

General information about the car

Tested model Chevrolet Spark 1.0 Base Grade, steering wheel
Body type 5-door hatchback
Year of data publishing 2009
Curb weight, kg 978

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is
Front Belts Load Loaders There is
Driver Front Airbag There is (single-stage)
Passenger Front Airbag There is (two-stage)
Side airbags There is
Side chest airbags There is
Airbag for knees and drivers No

Photo crash test