Crash Test Chevrolet Cruze since 2009 Sedan

Crash test Chevrolet Cruze 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013: Labotor assessment of the safety of the car: ranking on points, test report (photo and video crash test)
96%
Driver and passengers
34%
Pedestrians
84%
Passenger children
71%
Active security system

Driver and passengers. Common score 35 | 96%

Front Point (16 points)

 crash test
Driver
 Passenger safety
Passenger
evaluation of the crash test - Fine
 Crash test Chevrolet Cruze since 2009 - Good
 Satisfactorily - Satisfactorily
Badly - Badly
Very bad - Very bad
Head
Driver's Head Contact with AirbagStable
Passenger's head contact with airbagStable
Breast
Passenger branchStable
Displacement front rack back5 mm.
Shift steering wheel backNo
Shift steering wheel upNo
Chest contact with steering wheelNo
Top of legs, knees and hip area
Contact with firm elements of the front panelNo
KneesNo
Lower leg and foot
Foot recess compressionNo
Displacement pedals backNo
Pedal shift topNo

Side collision with a car (8 points), and with a pillar (7.4 points)

 Collision with cars
Automobile
side collision with post
Pillar
Head AirbagThere is
Breast AirbagThere is

Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)

chevrolet Cruze Spine Protection since 2009
Description of the chair
Type of head restraintPassive
Geometric assessment0.8
Test
- Strong kick2.4
- Middle Stick2.2
- Weak strike2.2

Children's passengers. Common score 41 | 84%

Child up to 18 months
Brand chairBritax Romer Baby SafeFront shock
Emergency Group0, 0+Head move forwardProtected
LocationFace backScald accelerationModerate
FasteningISOFIX and support beltChest loadInsignificant
Side strike
 CHEVROLET CRUZE protection evaluation since 2009Evaluation of protection12Fixation of the headProtected
Marking Evaluation4Scald accelerationModerate
Evaluation of fastening2
Child older than 3 years
Brand chairBritax Romer Duo PlusFront shock
Emergency Group1Head move forwardProtected
LocationFace forwardScald accelerationModerate
FasteningISOFIX and safety strapChest loadSignificant
Side strike
 Evaluation of protection11.3Fixation of the headProtected
Marking Evaluation4Scald accelerationModerate
Evaluation of fastening2
Assessment of car5Airbag Prevention WarningSticker with text on sunscreen visor

Pedestrians. Common score 12 | 34% System Act. Safety Common Score 5 | 71%

safety pedestrians
Chevrolet Cruze since 2009 - Fine
 Good - Good
Satisfactorily - Satisfactory
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter0 (missing)
Stability Course (ESC)3 (in basic configuration)
Signaling about unatigned safety belts2 (driver and passenger)
Head6.2
Hip area.0
Legs6

Protection of adult passengers:

The car scored the maximum number of points for protection with a frontal impact, and mannequin sensors noted the good protection of all parts of the body. The passenger salon was deformed slightly. The windshield stand shifted back only by 5 mm. The manufacturer managed to prove that the same level of protection of the knees and thighs is provided by sedresses of various types and in various positions. For protection when hit by side, the car also got the highest assessment, however, when hitting a post, the chest protection before such a high level did not reach. Protection against injuries when hit behind a good.

Security of passenger children

Based on the testimony of the sensors of the mannequin for the protection of an 18-month passenger during the front and lateral blows of Chevrolet Cruze received the maximum number of points. The jerk forward 3-year-old head with a frontal impact was insignificant, and with the side body of both were securely fixed in their chairs. The front passenger airbag can be disabled, which allows you to install a children's chair "against the direction of movement" to this place. However, informing the driver about the status of the pillow is not clear enough. Reliably glued warnings report the danger of such an installation of a children's chair opposite the active cushion.

Protection of pedestrians

Bumper scored the maximum number of points for protecting foot pedestrians, but the front edge of the hood did not score a single score, ensuring bad protection. The surface of the hood weakly softened the child's head blow and even worse in the adult head strike places.

Protection of pedestrians

The stabilization system and alarm on the unsuccessful safety belts of the driver and the front passenger are included in the basic configuration.

General information about the car

Tested model Chevrolet Cruze 1.6 Ls, steering wheel
Body type 4-door sedan
Year of data publishing 2009
Curb weight, kg 1343

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts There is (double tension)
Front Belts Load Loaders There is
Driver Front Airbag There is (single-stage)
Passenger Front Airbag There is (single-stage)
Side airbags There is
Side chest airbags There is
Airbag for knees and drivers No

Photo crash test

Video crash test