Driver and passengers. Common score 35 | 97%
Frontal impact (15.4 points)
Driver |
Passenger |
| - | Fine |
| - | Good |
| - | Satisfactorily |
| - | Badly |
| - | Very bad |
|
|
Head |
Driver's Head Contact with Airbag | stable |
Passenger's head contact with airbag | stable |
Breast |
Passenger branch | stable |
Displacement front rack back | 4mm. |
Shift steering wheel back | no |
Shift steering wheel up | no |
Chest contact with steering wheel | no |
Top of legs, knees and hip area |
Contact with firm elements of the front panel | no |
Knees | no |
Lower leg and foot |
Foot recess compression | no |
Displacement pedals back | brake pedal - 11mm |
Pedal shift top | no |
|
Side collision with car (8 points), and with post (7.9 points)
Automobile |
Pillar |
|
Head Airbag | yes |
Breast Airbag | yes |
|
Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)
|
Description of the chair | tissue upholstery, manual setting in 6 positions |
Type of head restraint | Return |
Geometric assessment | 1 |
Test |
- Strong kick | 2,5 |
- Middle Stick | 2,5 |
- Weak strike | 2,4 |
|
Children's passengers. Common score 42 | 85%
Child up to 18 months |
Brand chair | Fair G0 / 1 S | Front shock |
Emergency Group | 0, 0+ | Head move forward | protected |
Location | face back | Scald acceleration | maximum rating |
Fastening | ISOFIX Mounting and Support Frame | Chest load | maximum rating |
Side strike |
| Evaluation of protection | 11,9 | Fixation of the head | protected |
Marking Evaluation | 4 | Scald acceleration | max Evaluation |
Evaluation of fastening | 2 | |
Child older than 3 years |
Brand chair | Fair G0 / 1 S | Front shock |
Emergency Group | 1 | Head move forward | protected |
Location | face forward | Scald acceleration | maximum rating |
Fastening | ISOFIX Mounting and Support Frame | Chest load | weak |
Side strike |
| Evaluation of protection | 11,7 | Fixation of the head | protected |
Marking Evaluation | 4 | Scald acceleration | max Evaluation |
Evaluation of fastening | 2 | |
Assessment of car | 6 | Airbag Prevention Warning | Present on both sides of the driver and passenger solar visor |
Pedestrians. Common score 23 | 63% System Act. Safety Common Score 6 | 86%
- Fine
|
- Good
|
- Satisfactory
|
|
|
Speed \u200b\u200blimiter | - 0, not available |
Stability Course (ESC) | 3 |
Signaling about unatigned safety belts | 3 Informer: Driver, Front passenger and rear passengers |
Head | 13,5 |
Hip area | 3,1 |
Legs | 6 |
|
Protection of adult passengers:
With a frontal blow, the passenger interior retained the integrity. Analysis of the testimony of the mannequin sensors showed good protection of the knees and the hips of the driver and passenger of the front seat. The same level of security was detected for passengers of various types and sitting in different positions. The car scored the maximum number of points in the side shock on the overlap. In a more severe side test, good protection was provided with all parts of the body, except for the chest, where protection can be called acceptable. The test of the active headrest (head restraint, which moves forward, thereby blowing the force when the passenger's body is pressed into the chair during the accident) showed good protection against the injuries of the cervical spine in the event of a blow from behind.
Security of passenger children
With a frontal impact, the movement of a mannequin of a 3-year-old child who was sitting in the children's chair "along the movement", was not very strong. In the lateral test, the movement of both children has resulted in the seats. The front passenger airbag can be turned off to establish a children's chair "against the direction of movement" on this place, but the information provided by the driver relative to the airbag state is not clear enough.
Protection of pedestrians
The car scored the greatest number of points for ensuring the protection of the pedestrian foot from the bumper. The minimum pedestrian protection provides the front edge of the hood. Most places where the child's head can suffer, the hood provides good defense. Nevertheless, for places where the head of an adult pedestrian could suffer, the hood provides a very low level of protection.
Protection of pedestrians
The system of course stability (ESC), as well as alarm on the non-unspecified front and rear seat belts, is included in the basic configuration of all modifications of the model.
General information about the car
Tested model |
Alfa Romeo 1.6 Lt Jtd 'Distinctive', model with left tower |
Body type |
hatchback (5 doors) |
Year of data publishing |
2010 |
Curb weight, kg |
1334 kg |
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ... |
applicable to all models Giuliettas |
Safety systems:
Pretensels of front seat belts |
double seat belt pretensioners |
Front Belts Load Loaders |
There is |
Driver Front Airbag |
Two-stage |
Passenger Front Airbag |
Two-stage |
Side airbags |
There is |
Side Head Airbags |
There is |
Driver's knees airbag |
No |
Dynamic stabilization system |
No |
Reminder of non-profitable safety belts |
No |