Test drive Volkswagen Touran 2003 - 2006 Minivan
Disassembling puffy
![](http://www.bibipedia.info/media/photo_testi/39554.jpg)
Probably, calling them compactwenes is not entirely true. Great. But even to volumes, for example, Volkswagen Sharan, Ford Galaxy or Opel Sintra. It is understandable, because Touran is built on the basis of the fifth golf, C-Max is a slightly elongated future Focus II, and Zafira, respectively, the grown prototype of astrail. It turns out that they are in some special, extra-class niche, for which they have not yet come up with a human name. In the meantime, let them come up with compactives. For all the popularity of such cars in Europe, on Russian roads, they are still found infrequently. Our fellow tribesman, due to numerous national-monthly features, gives a fair preference to SUVs. But if the financial situation does not change in the near future, holders of average sustainable income are quite capable of buying something similar to Turan, Si-Max or Safip.
![](http://www.bibipedia.info/media/photo_testi/39555.jpg)
![](http://www.bibipedia.info/media/photo_testi/39556.jpg)
![](http://www.bibipedia.info/media/photo_testi/39557.jpg)
Dynamics The main task of our test is to evaluate the practicality and fitness of cars for family matters, so we did not particularly pick up the engine selection. We got Zafira in the maximum configuration (except the skin) with a 147-horsepower engine of 2.2 liters and even with an automaton, Touran is already almost traditionally with a 1.9 liter turbodiesel with a capacity of 100 liters. With. with mechanics, and Focus C-Max with its only 120-horsepower engine of 1.8 liters (a 2-liter engine is promised later). The conditions, at first glance, are not at all equal. But, oddly enough, all three individuals turned out to be quite worthy competitors. Honestly, we were even pleased with the gun with a machine gun. There were never complaints about his surprisingly clear and comfortable work, and an instant response to the gas pedal and powerful, impressive acceleration cannot help but give pleasure. Do not have time to say once and already hisses the wind in the seals.
At first, I did not remember that under the hood of Turan Tourbodiesel. Only five minutes later. Having managed to rejoice at the delightful fifth gear of 6-speed mechanics during this time, I finally drew attention to the trembling of the clutch pedal under the foot and the scale of the tachometer, marked only to 6,000 revolutions. Then I remembered, a kettle. I would not say that Turan is bullets. But it accelerates and goes very well, not in an iot, not inferior to most foreign participants in the Moscow movement. Moreover, it should not even try to twist over 4,500 revolutions. Because the Turanovsky diesel shows all its advantages in the range from 1,500. And that is why I admired the universal fifth gear, in which, in principle, you can move around the city, as on a machine gun. That is, of course, it is impossible to move with the fifth, but switching from the second to the fifth, it is easily worried. And everything is conveniently lever lies comfortably in the hand, the programs do not need to feel. Only with switching down I experienced some difficulties with the sixth a couple of times instead of the fifth to the third, and with the fifth instead of the fourth to the second.
C-Max outside, as well as inside, is very attractive. It is immediately obvious that he is the youngest, but carefully planned and long -awaited child from the entire trinity. The circulation is huge, but you will look like manual work. It was located in the driver's seat oh, how good, how convenient, spacious! He put one hand on the lever of the box, the second on a pleasant thick lamb, groped for the clutch with his left foot and realized that he was born for C-Max! Bliss! And go, in theory, should be great ... should ... no, no! Everything is in order, an elastic set of speed, interconnected and understandable work of the box The moves are small and everything is clear. But something is missing. As if someone holds from behind and does not let it go. By the way, about 1.8 liter engines. And not only Fordovsky, but also Opelian, Mercedes, French ... They became tasteless, or something, all world car manufacturers. Tolerant as distilled water. It seems like he swallowed moisture and after a minute he forgot that he drank. Neither salty nor sweet. No. Neither syrup to you, nor lemon, nor, at least, vinegar.
![](http://www.bibipedia.info/media/photo_testi/39558.jpg)
![](http://www.bibipedia.info/media/photo_testi/39559.jpg)
![](http://www.bibipedia.info/media/photo_testi/39560.jpg)
Our front -wheel drive trinity in this genre, frankly, found controllability. Focus C-Max is controlled simply perfectly. In any weather conditions, he is extremely granted on the road, there are no unnecessary movements and slurred reactions, there is no hidden expectation of at least some incident. A complex, stealing rear multi -link suspension plays one of the leading roles in the play with many high -speed turns, helping to drive them correctly and quickly, but without much risk. At the same time, C-Max is perhaps a little harsh for a family car. Although, for high -quality and gambling, this is rather a plus than a minus. Turan, surprisingly, is similar to C-Max Suspension setting. In terms of stiffness, obvious overkill. Or, more precisely, a shortage. Any hit in a decent pit is fraught with untimely returning the rod of the rear shock absorber to its original position. Either its length is not enough, or return reactions are slowed down. But, although Touran tends to fall in the direction of turning, the reaction for the discharge of gas is predictable and understandable. Almost always in these cases, electronic stabilization systems help the driver. So, if you avoid incorrect roads and extreme provocations, then moving on the tourist is more than pleasant and extremely comfortable.
Here the ambush is not turned off ESP. She strangles the engine, not allowing him to experiment once again. And I would like. Because this is the most correctly configured car in the classroom. The suspension at first glance may seem softer than we would like. But during the operation, it turns out that it is calculated perfectly minor irregularities almost imperceptibly for passengers, conscientiously concealing significant ones. Moreover, it is drawn to travel sideways on it or in some other way, but, firstly, it does not allow ESP to indulge, and secondly, decent people do not hooligate on a family car. By the way, it is not a sin to repeat: the Opelians for some reason be silent for the application of the hands of Porsche specialists to the chassis and steering systems of the Software. However, maybe they are right to scream about it once again, when it is clear that the SAFIRA is controlled perfectly.
In our case, the potential buyer must firmly determine the parameters of the desired all three of our cars, although classmates, but according to the total advantages and disadvantages identified during the test, are designed for a strictly individual circle of users. Say, if a person is moderately conservative, thorough, and not in his rules to change habits, then he, of course, will choose a proven background due to its age and by virtue of greater knowledge. It is nice to carry people in it, and it is easy to load something voluminous and it is controlled at the same time very well. And such a strangeness, the longer Zafira is produced, the more you are convinced of the isolation of this car from the entire OPEL lineup. She, without any reservations, is not only one of the best creations of the Adamo-Opel team, she, in all respects, the true classic of the genre. A liberal-minded act of an accountist, having thought three hundred times, will finally stop his choice on the tourist, he still does not know if he will come in handy the third row of seats, but he loves when the car is assembled impeccably, without a single crooked shovchik and gap. And also a significant argument with impressive volumes and the enviable practicality of the transformer salon, an economical diesel, which really consumes a little more than seven liters of diesel fuel per 100 km of the city cycle, a real find. Now, if the price for the car in the basic configuration was not so high ...
C-MAX car for young parents, to which the total spiritual volume of all family members is much more important than the internal volume of their new car. Dad is purposeful, and his eternal style of dynamics and perfection, mom is concentrated, children from the diapers love a computer and skiing. C-Max is for them. In the cabin, you can even talk in a whisper at a speed of more than 120. Find such a low -noise, masking, but roomy car even today is a big problem. Unless some kind of limousine of the highest class. But this is already a different level, other values \u200b\u200band other money. Therefore, a formal dock, instead of a full-fledged spare, is a trifle that should not be paid attention to.
HOW DO THEY LOOK
Nikita Rozanov
Outside: if you literally translate from English minivan, it turns out that our test is three mini-furgies, minivagon or minibus ... some kind of nonsense. Get looking, because these are just pretty and cozy family wagons of increased capacity and, I would add, increased and more comfortable landing. It is this feature of the layout that forms the brightest features of the architecture of their bodies. The design is moderately corporate with basic models: Ford Focus, Opel Astra and VW Golf V, respectively. True, the style of the tested is less emotional than that of donors, but this is also supposed to be a business and practical station wagon in status. The restraint of feelings is especially noticeable in the appearance of VW, whose appearance can be compared with a strict cool lady with a pointer in her hands. Ford's most playful design. Opel, as always, confidently occupies the position of a strong middle peasant. From the face, thanks to a large proprietary emblem in the center of the radiator cladding, each of the cars is recognizable. But if you close it, then determine at first sight what the model is in front of you is difficult. Silhouettes are more characteristic, but remain within the framework of the class image. The S-MAX has the most dynamic profile (reinforced with a significant inclination of the fifth door), which brings the utilitarianism of the station wagon to the sacrifice of the style. In the back of the Ford, also in the leaders and thanks to the lifted lighting technology, both Focus brother and just a more modern car resemble.
Inside: Bus genes are most obvious in the architecture of the C-MAX instrument panel: the console sticks out a characteristic chin that is not related to the overlay of the floor tunnel. But for some reason, these associations come up with confidence in the superiority of this decision over the other two. Zafira, a very passenger architecture and plastic panel, and Touran is frankly dreary in comparison with them. The shape of the panels of the doors upholstery is organic and solid in all cars, with the exception of VW, where it is not clear where the silver lining with the acceleration comes from where the panel flies into the corner of the panel, which can cause only bewilderment. The rudders, with the exception of Opel, the four -spokes and thanks to chubby pillows look very modern, and Ford is also very stylish.
Summary: each of the cars is a reasonable choice of those who prefer functionalism and utilitarianism to all other components of a good car. In each of them, the corporate design is combined with the original style, the variety of which fully meets the tastes of various consumers.
Text Nikolay Ushanov photo Alexander Nozdrin
Source: Cars
VOLKSWAGEN TOURAN 2003 - 2006 Kras
Volkswagen Touran 2003 test drives - 2006
Krash Test Volkswagen Touran 2003 - 2006
Krassh Test: Detailed Information33%
Driver and passengers
19%
Pedestrians