Citroen C1 Cast Test 5 doors since 2009 hatchback

Driver and passengers. Common score 25 | 68%

Frontal impact (10.8 points)

Driver Passenger - Excellent - Okay - Satisfactorily - bad - Very bad

Head Driver's Head Contact with Airbag stable Passenger's head contact with airbag stable Chest Passenger branch stable Displacement front rack back 24mm Shift steering wheel back 39mm Shift steering wheel up 45mm. Chest contact with steering wheel yes Top of legs, knees and hip area Contact with firm elements of the front panel Steering column with position adjustment and protective casing; egnition lock Knees Steering column with position adjustment, as well as a protective cover; egnition lock Lower leg and foot Foot recess compression not Displacement pedals back brake pedal - 140mm Pedal shift top clutch pedal - 12mm

Side collision with car (6.3 points), and with post (6.5 points)

Car Poll

Head Airbag yes Breast Airbag yes

Blow from behind (spinal protection) (points)

Description of the chair Standard, manual adjustment in 4 positions Type of head restraint passive Geometric assessment 0 Test - Strong kick 1,4 - Middle Stick 0,9 - Weak strike 0,7

Children's passengers. Total score 36 | 73%

Child up to 18 months
Brand chair	ritax-R.		Front shock
Emergency Group	0+		Head move forward	protected
Location	face back		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	adult seat belts		Chest load	weak
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	8,6	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2

Child older than 3 years
Brand chair	ritax-R.		Front shock
Emergency Group	I.		Head move forward	protected
Location	face forward		Scald acceleration	maximum rating
Fastening	ISOFIX fastening with a safety cable		Chest load	maximum rating
			Side strike
	Evaluation of protection	12	Fixation of the head	protected
	Marking Evaluation	4	Scald acceleration	max Evaluation
	Evaluation of fastening	2
Assessment of car	3		Airbag Prevention Warning	Text and graphic pictogram are applied on both visors

Pedestrians. Common score 19 | 53% ACT system. Safety Common Score 5 | 71%

- Well - Okay - Satisfactory

Speed \u200b\u200blimiter The presence is not estimated Stability Course (ESC) 3 Signaling about unatigned safety belts Two: Driver and Front Passenger Head 13,2 Hip area 0 Legs 6

Protection of adult passengers:

With a frontal collision, the reaction of this C1 is the same as in the vehicle tested in 2005, whose data was used with the test. The salon remained as strong in front of the front collision. However, the breast drill department was injured when a collision with a steering wheel was collided. For which the model has received negative points. Sensors on the mannequin indicated good protection in the knee and hips of the driver and passenger. However, the inspection of the dashboard showed that some parts and elements represent the risk of injury, depending on the growth of the person and the position in which it was located. The deformation in the area of \u200b\u200bthe legs was minimal, but the testers noted that the brake pedal was blocked and moved back, thus increasing the risk of injury to the heads and feet of the driver. Side airbags that were up to 2013 are available as an option, steel on all models. Sensors have shown that the seats and head restraints have poor neck protection and increase the risk of injury, in the case of rear collisions.

Security of passenger children

Based on the testimony in frontal and lateral tests, the car scored the maximum number of points for the protection of a 3-year-old child. Mannequin was sitting in a children's chair, which was fixed by the ISOFIX fastening. The movement of the head forward and on the parties did not exceed the norm. In both tests, the mannequin did not damage the interior parts.

Protection of pedestrians

The bumper scored the maximum number of points for good pedestrian foot protection in all trials. However, the front edge of the hood did not score a single point.

Protection of pedestrians

The C1 coursework system is currently available only optionally, however, since July 2013, it becomes standard equipment in the basic configuration. Also, since July 2013, a standard signage of non-unspeted safety belts for the front passenger will cease to enter the basic configuration. The signaling device for the rear sedes and the speed limiter in this model are missing.

General information about the car

Tested model	Tested Car: Toyota Aygo 1.0 High Grade, model with left handle
Body type	hatchback (5 doors)
Year of data publishing	2012
Curb weight, kg	845 kg
The results are valid for VIN, starting with ...	see comments

Safety systems:

Pretensels of front seat belts	there is
Front Belts Load Loaders	there is
Driver Front Airbag	there is
Passenger Front Airbag	there is
Side airbags	Standard since July 2013
Side Head Airbags	STANDARD FROM JULY 2013
Driver's knees airbag	Not
Dynamic stabilization system	STANDARD FROM JULY 2013
Reminder of non-profitable safety belts	Standard for the driver, standard for the front passenger - from July 2013